The moderation role of board independence change in the relationship between board characteristics, related party transactions, and financial performance

Abstract

The present study examines the moderation effect of board independence change on the relationship between board characteristics, related party transactions and financial performance of Indian listed banks over 10 years from 2010 to 2019. While board size, independence, diligence, and remuneration were taken to represent board characteristics, all key personnel and subsidiaries’ transactions were considered measures for related party transactions. On the other hand, the financial performance of banks was measured by two accounting-based measures (return on assets and profit after tax) and two market-based measures (earning per share and Tobin Q). The results revealed that board independence change has a significant negative effect on financial performance. Further, the results indicated that board independence change moderates positively and significantly the relationship between related party transactions and financial performance. The findings also showed that board independence change had a moderating effect that significantly and negatively weakens board size and effectiveness, negatively influencing banks’ profitability. Unlike other studies, this study uniquely uses board independence change as a moderator between board characteristics, related party transactions, and several measures of banks’ financial performance. The limited research highlighting this issue, where Indian banks have encountered several challenges in the last few years, has motivated the present study to bridge the existing gaps in the strand literature. Therefore, this research opens useful insights and has beneficial implications for policymakers, bankers, financial analysts, and academicians.

The impact of corporate environmental disclosure practices and board attributes on sustainability: Empirical evidence from Asia and Europe

“…Several studies have established an evidence on the association between ESG disclosures and CG mechanisms; board size [ 23 , 25 , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] ]. Most of the existing studies on this topic have found evidence of a positive and significant correlation between board size and both ED and sustainability performance.…”

Tunnelling Behavior: Exploring Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure

“…The study showed an average tunnelling value of 0.038. Meanwhile, research in India conducted by [4] regarding the moderation effect of independent boards in the relationship between related party transactions and banks' financial performance showed an average related party transactions value of 0.03. Furthermore, research in Hong Kong conducted by [57] on Capital-Market Liberalization and Controlling Shareholders' Tunneling showed an average tunnelling value of 0.0161.…”

Country-level governance and sustainable development goals: implications for firms’ sustainability performance

“…This agrees with prior works. For example, Almaqtari et al (2022) indicate that board independence plays a crucial role in explaining disparities in the quality of environmental performance. Similarly, Rupley et al (2012) conclude that the readiness of a company to provide transparent environmental performance that is accessible to a wide range of stakeholders is influenced by board independence.…”