Do regions matter? An integrated institutional and semiglobalization perspective on the internationalization of MNEs

Abstract

Traditional research suggests a relationship between country‐level institutions and the location choices of MNEs. However, more recent theory suggests MNEs also focus on regions (semiglobalization). Therefore, this study examines institutional effects in the context of semiglobalization by considering the influences of three formal institutions (i.e., regulatory control, political democracy, capital investments) of countries and geographic regions on MNEs' location choices of internationalization. We use a sample of Japanese MNEs operating in 45 countries within eight regions. The results show that their degree of internationalization into a country is influenced by both country and regional institutional environments. Additionally, a semiglobalization perspective provides better explanatory power than does the country‐level perspective. These results present a new perspective on how MNEs consider institutional environments in their international strategy. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Internationalization strategy and the home-regionalization hypothesis: The case of Australian multinational enterprises

“…Despite definitional disagreements, however, the grouping on the basis of geography is deemed appropriate on the grounds of its recognized centrality to organizing international strategy (Arregle et al, 2013;Buckley and Ghauri, 2004) and time-invariance . Following prior studies (e.g.…”

A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise

“…Recent evidence (Arregle, Miller, Hitt, & Beamish, 2013) indicates that prior investment in a region made up of multiple countries impacts future decisions to invest in these countries: that is, capabilities can be redeployed within regions more readily than between them. This finding, which goes beyond previous country-level analyses, is consistent with capability transfer being easier with geographic proximity, and with institutional and language similarity.…”

Global, Local, or Regional? The Locus of MNE Strategies

“…To the extent that the comparatively lower intra‐regional distance has been ‘crafted’, for example as the result of regional trade and investment agreements such as the North‐American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) or the European Union/European Monetary Union (EU/EMU), barriers to profitable growth may be raised for regional outsiders relative to insiders. However, the magnitude of the business opportunity, elevated from the country level to the regional one, may also increase for the outsiders (Arregle et al, ). The locus of some business opportunities thus shifts from the left to the centre of the horizontal axis of Figure .…”