2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do plastic warning labels reduce consumers' willingness to pay for plastic egg packaging? – Evidence from a choice experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The molecular-docking approach is based on the lock-and-key principle, which is used for binding small ligand molecules to receptor proteins [ 59 ]. The space shape and energy between the ligand and acceptor during docking should be matched to obtain the most stable binding conformation [ 60 ]. Rubber is a polymer compound but its structure is not complex and is usually formed by specific structural units linked hundreds or thousands of times by covalent bonds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular-docking approach is based on the lock-and-key principle, which is used for binding small ligand molecules to receptor proteins [ 59 ]. The space shape and energy between the ligand and acceptor during docking should be matched to obtain the most stable binding conformation [ 60 ]. Rubber is a polymer compound but its structure is not complex and is usually formed by specific structural units linked hundreds or thousands of times by covalent bonds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these communications, corporations not only engage the consumer but also invoke the consumer as the figure for whom they act (Evans et al, 2017;Cherrier and Türe, 2022). In this manner, the expansion of warning plastic labels including "plastic containing BPA," "PET plastic," "made with Bisphenol A" and the development of new markers for ("reusable") plastic packaging (Van Asselt et al, 2022) or plastic bottles (Burrows et al, 2022) impose a responsibility for consumers to become informed, to carefully read labels, and to make choices in accordance with their willingness to bear risks for their health and for the environment (Mykitiuk, 2002;Giesler and Veresiu, 2014;Cherrier and Türe, 2022;Döbbe and Cederberg, 2023). In this manner, "when we see discarded plastic bags, bottles or food packages, we can relate our own use of the same objects to potential consequences" (Nielsen et al, 2019, p. 6).…”
Section: Fragmented Plastic Governance and Consumer Responsibilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review of the literature on "environmentally friendly food packaging" reports that in most of the studies analyzed, consumers were willing to pay more for such packaging (Ketelsen et al, 2020). On the other hand, a logo warning of the plastic pollution caused by packaging can reduce consumers' WTP (Van Asselt et al, 2022). However, another Canadian study obtains that the WTP for cereal bars in cardboard packaging with environmental certification does not make consumers want to pay more (Ertz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Wtp In the Food And Packaging Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, offering milk in a returnable glass container is a reason to pay more (Neill and Williams, 2016). In addition, consumer interest in organic produce may encourage the purchase of fruit and vegetables without packaging (van Herpen et al, 2016). Finally, the fact that consumers must pay more for eco-responsible packaging (including bulk products) encourages them to prefer the sustainable packaging option to bulk products, when they have the choice (De Canio, 2023).…”
Section: Wtp In the Food And Packaging Sectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%