2018
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do natural enemies explain fluctuations in low‐density spruce budworm populations?

Abstract: Understanding the causal pathways through which forest insect outbreaks are triggered is important for resource managers. However, detailed population dynamics studies are hard to conduct in low-density, pre-outbreak populations because the insects are difficult to sample in sufficient numbers. Using laboratory-raised larvae installed in the field across a 1,000 km east-west gradient in Québec (Canada) over an 11-yr period, we examined if parasitism and predation were likely to explain fluctuations in low-dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It therefore appears that endemic spruce budworm populations are kept in check by generalist parasitoids. Contrary to Theory 2 (Figure 1), our observations do not support the idea of a gradual relaxation of their impact over time, and thus populations do not rise after a gradual drop of mortality from natural enemies (JR, unpublished data; this study; [24]). But if budworm outbreaks do not occur as a result of a cyclical (regular) change in the impact of natural enemies, but rather in response to a sudden change in survival or apparent fecundity that shifts populations beyond the Allee threshold, how can a more-or-less regular outbreak cycle materialize?…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It therefore appears that endemic spruce budworm populations are kept in check by generalist parasitoids. Contrary to Theory 2 (Figure 1), our observations do not support the idea of a gradual relaxation of their impact over time, and thus populations do not rise after a gradual drop of mortality from natural enemies (JR, unpublished data; this study; [24]). But if budworm outbreaks do not occur as a result of a cyclical (regular) change in the impact of natural enemies, but rather in response to a sudden change in survival or apparent fecundity that shifts populations beyond the Allee threshold, how can a more-or-less regular outbreak cycle materialize?…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We do not have an answer to this question. Fluctuations in the impact of natural enemies may be involved under some circumstances, but not generally [24]. It is possible that the likelihood of such a sudden shift in survival increases over time as forest stands recovering from a previous outbreak age and host-tree masting becomes more prevalent over a landscape [25]; masting events occur synchronously over rather large areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 20th century, there were three SBW outbreaks (Blais, 1962;Morin, 1994). Since 2006, a new outbreak has been ongoing, affecting more than of 8 M ha with defoliation concentrated in stands dominated by balsam fir and black spruce (Boulanger et al, 2016(Boulanger et al, , 2017Bouchard et al, 2018). SBW lay eggs mainly in upper crown of trees in July.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spatial distribution of performance reflects the known decreasing survival and fecundity of the parasitoid with increasing temperatures [35], explained as an interaction between SBW's immune system and the parasitoid's polydnavirus [58,59]. Lower rates of SBW parasitism by T. rostrale occur in sites where temperatures are higher [22]. However, results of the present study indicate that the complex spatial patterns of parasitoid performance result from interactions of survival from egg to adult, realized fecundity, voltinism, and synchrony with the overwintering host.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Spatial and temporal differences in SBW parasitism by T. rostrale have been described for several sites in northeastern North America and have generally been linked to SBW population densities. The impact of T. rostrale decreases as SBW populations increase [4,23] and seems negatively affected by the abundance of competing parasitoid species [22,32,56]. In the present model, we used a simple description of density dependence in parasitoid attack, and there was no consideration of either intraor interspecific competition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%