2020
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01109-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do metaphorical sharks bite? Simulation and abstraction in metaphor processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, by comparing the two types of verbal metaphors and the corresponding processing of literal-concrete and literal-abstract meanings, the results support the simulation-abstraction hybrid view, that is, both simulation and abstraction are viable mechanisms for processing metaphorical meaning ( Al-Azary and Katz, 2020 ). Verbal metaphor comprehension is not entirely based on sensorimotor simulation but also counts on semantic abstraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, by comparing the two types of verbal metaphors and the corresponding processing of literal-concrete and literal-abstract meanings, the results support the simulation-abstraction hybrid view, that is, both simulation and abstraction are viable mechanisms for processing metaphorical meaning ( Al-Azary and Katz, 2020 ). Verbal metaphor comprehension is not entirely based on sensorimotor simulation but also counts on semantic abstraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Recent studies confirm that the involvement of sensorimotor network and abstraction process is dynamic in metaphor comprehension ( Al-Azary and Katz, 2020 ). Based on previous research, the present study further compares the activation of concrete and abstract meanings in the processing of subject-verb metaphors and verb-object metaphors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reported in Table 3 are significantly in line with this view. This suggests that, in terms of mechanisms of embodied understanding, metaphorical and literal statements are similar [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Some examples of similarity between the embodied/gestural realization of each metaphorical category and the embodied/gestural realization of its corresponding literal category have been shown in Figure 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a questionnaire might allow the maintenance of the 'breadth' of emotions we were seeking to assess while still measuring a degree of 'affectiveness'. Additionally, aligning reported aesthetic experiences with neural activity (e.g., increased sensorimotor simulation [45] or bihemispheric activity [46]) might represent another step in further understanding the curious relationship between optimally difficult metaphors and the feelings they provoke.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%