2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1311473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Investors Value a Firm's Commitment to Social Activities? The Moderating Role of Intangibles and the Impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent US studies are still getting mixed results, with Rogers et al (2008) finding a positive relationship only for firms that also devote significant resources to research and development (R&D) and other intangible assets, whereas Becchitti and Ciriretti (2006) find a negative relationship after controlling for industry effects. In studies using other than US data, no relationship was found between CSR and corporate performance for Australian firms (Brine et al, 2009) and Brazilian firms (Fiori et al, 2007), while a negative relationship was found for the UK (Brammer et al, 2006) and Brazilian companies (Crisostomo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Csr and Corporate Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent US studies are still getting mixed results, with Rogers et al (2008) finding a positive relationship only for firms that also devote significant resources to research and development (R&D) and other intangible assets, whereas Becchitti and Ciriretti (2006) find a negative relationship after controlling for industry effects. In studies using other than US data, no relationship was found between CSR and corporate performance for Australian firms (Brine et al, 2009) and Brazilian firms (Fiori et al, 2007), while a negative relationship was found for the UK (Brammer et al, 2006) and Brazilian companies (Crisostomo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Csr and Corporate Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social responsibility seems rather to have an ambiguous and complex impact on firm performance, although no true causality has been proved yet. While a lot of research points towards a mild positive relationship (Aupperle, Carroll, & Hatfield, 1985); (McGuire, Sundgren, & Schneeweis, 1988); (Orlitzky et al, 2003); (Maron et al, 2006); (Wu, 2006); (Rodgers, Choy, & Guiral, 2008), this connection has not been fully established (Polonsky, Neville, Bell, & Mengüç, 2005);(Prado-Lorenzo, Gallego-Alvarez, & Garcia-Sanchez, 2009),; (Park & Lee, 2009) and the mechanisms through which performance is enhanced by CSR are not well understood (Jawahar & McLaughlin, 2001);Mill, 2006;Barnett and Salomon, 2006). Qu (2009) argues that lack of coherence between earlier and more recent studies may be attributed to the fact that "business environments are in a state of flux and the current business environments are becoming more favourable towards businesses that place an emphasis on CSR".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Erragraguy and Revelli (2015) approach the comparison in a different way explaining that the performance of Islamic investment, in the long run, may be affected by concentration in investment in tangible assets, with more limited exposure to companies with substantial intangible assets such as reputation, R&D, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). On the other hand, responsible finance may deliver better performance in the long run because it embraces companies that are committed to a stakeholder model and a focus on innovation efforts that will drive long-term benefit (Edmans, 2012;Park, Kim, & Kwon, 2017;Rodgers, Choy, & Guiral, 2008). Interestingly, Islamic indices outperform during financial distress (Hoepner, Rammal, & Rezec, 2011;Walkshäusl & Lobe, 2012), which is often attributed to the exclusion of financial equities from the Shari'ah screened portfolio.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%