Do Interviews Influence Admission Decisions? An Empirical Analysis From an Institution

Abstract

Introduction The admission interview is regarded as one of the most significant moments in the process of applying to medical school, but there is limited empirical evidence that supports this claim. Previous analyses have offered what is largely anecdotal evidence of the interview’s importance while also suggesting that there is ample opportunity for ethnic and gender bias to impact interview scores. We also asked what medical schools can learn from comparing the attributes of matriculants and those applicants who rejected offers of acceptance. Materials and Methods This study investigated the association between interview performance and admission committee decisions for applicants applying to the School of Medicine of the USU. The study cohort included all candidates who were invited for an on-site interview at the USU in 2014, 2015, and 2016 (n = 1825). Results Seventeen percent of the variance of the outcome variables—admission committee decisions to accept, place on the alternate list, or reject an applicant—can be explained by considering interview scores alone. Applicant age, race, ethnicity, and gender did not significantly impact interview overall ratings. Matriculants to the USU had similar interview ratings and distribution of gender, race, and ethnicity when compared to those applicants who rejected offers of acceptance. Matriculants were more likely to have previous military experience. Conclusion Our analysis provides some justification for the importance of the interview in the admission process. Applicant demographics (age, race, gender, and ethnicity) were not associated with interview scores. Differences between matriculants to the USU and those who rejected offers of acceptance are small, indicating that the USU continues to build a class body that excels in both cognitive and noncognitive domains.

Students Perception About the Role of Interview During M.PHIL and PH.D. Admission at a Public Sector University of Lahore, Punjab-Pakistan

“…The interview panel selects dynamic, self-confident, and active participants for institutional better growth. The results of the current research are similar to the findings of the study framed byHamidi et al (2021) in the USA on a sample of 1,825 respondents to gauge students perception of interview performance. The results declared that male and female applicants age, race, and ethnicity have fewer influences on students overall interview situations.…”

“…There is enormous diversity in the designation and execution of interview selection. Interviews differ in terms of arrangement, structure, modes of styles, time management, evaluation of applicants responses, and their content of interview (Hamidi et al, 2021). They are designed to incorporate the interviewer as an applicant eyewitness, even though the remaining is more objective and resemblance to communication tests.…”

The impact of the medical school admissions interview: a systematic review

“…Interviews are part of the admissions process at many medical schools worldwide, including all schools in Canada and the United States (US). [1][2] The interviews help gather and verify information about applicants and recruit students, [3][4][5] and are weighted highly by medical school admissions committees, faculty and staff. 6,7 However, interviews have been controversial since the 1950s, when "A Critique of the Interview" was published describing the paucity of evidence supporting the utility of the admissions interview.…”