2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02294.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do graphic health warning labels have an impact on adolescents’ smoking‐related beliefs and behaviours?

Abstract: Graphic warning labels on cigarette packs are noticed by the majority of adolescents, increase adolescents' cognitive processing of these messages and have the potential to lower smoking intentions. Our findings suggest that the introduction of graphic warning labels may help to reduce smoking among adolescents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
139
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
139
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior smoking research has indicated that health beliefs about smoking are important psychological factors that influence adolescent decisions about smoking (Peracchio and Luna 1998). Moreover, survey work has shown that graphic visual warnings can increase cognitive processing of the labels, with more frequent reading, attention, thinking, and talking about the warning labels after exposure (White, Webster, and Wakefield 2008). This finding suggests a positive relationship between general beliefs about the health consequences of smoking and thoughts of quitting.…”
Section: Graphicnesssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Prior smoking research has indicated that health beliefs about smoking are important psychological factors that influence adolescent decisions about smoking (Peracchio and Luna 1998). Moreover, survey work has shown that graphic visual warnings can increase cognitive processing of the labels, with more frequent reading, attention, thinking, and talking about the warning labels after exposure (White, Webster, and Wakefield 2008). This finding suggests a positive relationship between general beliefs about the health consequences of smoking and thoughts of quitting.…”
Section: Graphicnesssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The results suggest that methods that help the individual to direct attention toward the long-term features of the stimuli (e.g., health in the case of food) may lead to better decisions in situations where immediate gratification is at odds with long-term well being. These findings also suggest a possible explanation, although a purely speculative one at this point, for why graphical cigarette warnings are associated with higher indicators of smoking cessation and prevention than less salient text warnings that convey similar information but may be less effective in capturing attention and, therefore, have less impact on value computations (White et al, 2008;Borland et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Perhaps negative role models, regardless of whether they emphasized health or social outcomes, were more effective at increasing willingness to stop smoking due to the widespread knowledge of negative outcomes associated with tobacco use in contemporary American society. Unlike in the past, today antitobacco campaigns are ubiquitous and smoking reduction/cessation polices are implemented more aggressively as evidenced by public policy as well as proliferating advertisements in the media (Farrelly, Nonnemaker, Davis, & Hussin, 2009;Hahn et al, 2008;White, Webster, & Wakefield, 2008;World Health Organization, 2009). Perhaps because the negative health outcomes of smoking are more salient today due to public awareness, young adults are focusing more closely on the negative outcomes of tobacco use, regardless of whether they are health or socially based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%