Do firms with different levels of environmental regulatory pressure behave differently regarding complementarity among innovation practices?

Abstract

This study explores the complementary effects among environmental innovation, organizational innovation, and training for innovation and their effect on firm productivity, within a supermodularity framework. Furthermore, it attempts to understand whether different innovation practices are complements or substitutes for firm profitability according to the industrial environmental regulation context by distinguishing between clean and dirty industries. Using a Spanish technological innovation panel survey over the period 2008-2015, our findings indicate that the interrelationship between different innovation practices is complementary rather than substitutive, and the pattern of complementarity among innovation practices differs according to the environmental regulation under which an industry operates. Engaging in a broad range of innovation practices such as environmental and organizational innovations, clean industry can strengthen productivity. For dirty industries, our results indicate a greater affinity between training activities and environmental innovation than between environmental innovation and organizational innovation on firm productivity achievement. Taken all together, these results provide managers with considerable insights in terms of how to adapt the various combinatorial practices to the industrial environment in which they are embedded, taking market and regulatory pressure into account. K E Y W O R D S complementarities, environmental innovation, organizational innovation, training, firm productivity, environmental regulatory pressure

Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources

“…With regard to this argument, Cainelli et al (2015) report that employee training is essential not only to transfer technological knowledge but also to increase awareness about the importance of dealing with environmental impacts and motivating employees to address environmental challenges. Furthermore, training has been considered as a key human resource strategy that provides the employee with the knowledge and information for the acquisition of skills necessary to perform and enhance their work (Garcia‐Marco, Zouaghi & Sánchez, 2020). Having adequate workplace organization and skills to recognize and address environmental issues can be key for green innovation (Ketata et al, 2015).…”

Green Strategy Effect on Financial and Environmental Performance: A Mediation Analysis of Product Quality

“…It is a fact that the global academic and policy environment is one that now emphasizes the need for firms and societies to adopt policies, strategies, and postures that pitch them as environmentally conscious entities. Studies like those of Al-romeedy [2]; Dai, Cantor & Montabon, [3]; Fanasch, [4]; García-marco & Sánchez, [5]; Ge et al [6]; Liu et al [7]; Malviya et al [8]; Yu & Han, [9]; H. Zhang et al [10], and W. Zhang et al [11] make it clear that environmental posturing is not only important, but remains a contemporary discourse. Also, whether it is the clichés of "green new deal", "carbon neutrality", "zero emissions" or even the global effort to deal with climate change per the "Paris Climate Accord", societies and policies are being designed to make entities appear environmentally responsible, for obvious beneficial reasons.…”

Influence of organisational innovation and innovation in general on eco-innovation in European companies

“…Furthermore, the relationship between the study variable and personnel training is not new in the academic literature (del Br ıo and Junquera, 2003). The results that highlight the positive association between eco-innovation and organisational innovation in the presence of training practices align with those of Garcia Marco et al (2020).…”

“…Several innovation practices related to organisational innovation (i.e. teamwork, employee participation, decentralisation in decision making) and training for innovation are considered key human capital management factors to achieve environmental objectives (Garc ıa-Marco et al, 2020). These could also include more formalised environmental management systems (EMSs; Rennings et al, 2006).…”