2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2313105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Employment Subsidies Reduce Early Apprenticeship Dropout?

Abstract: We evaluate the effect of the Apprenticeship Bonus, an employment subsidy program, on early drop out of apprenticeship. Only school leavers who did not succeed to start apprenticeship training directly after leaving school are eligible for this program. Our analysis is based on rich survey data that has been collected specifically for this study. Using this data, we investigate the selection into the program and analyze the effect of this subsidy on apprenticeship drop out risk. Even though the subsidy provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An understanding of factors responsible for non-completion of apprenticeship training would aid the development of strategies for improving its success. A number of investigations have provided insights into the factors responsible for non-completion (Donkor, 2012;Gambin and Hogarth, 2016) The factors identified from literature that contributes to the non-completion of apprentice training programme include age, race, gender, ethnicity, level of education, disability, academic achievement, loss of interest, interpersonal skills, economic background, language (Berik et al, 2011;Fries et al, 2014;Mangan and Trendle, 2008;Mangan and Trendle, 2010;Mangan and Trendle, 2017;Stromback and Mahendran, 2010). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the array of factors that lead to non-completion of apprenticeship among craftspeople.…”
Section: Factors Responsible For Non-completion Of the Apprenticeship Training Programmementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An understanding of factors responsible for non-completion of apprenticeship training would aid the development of strategies for improving its success. A number of investigations have provided insights into the factors responsible for non-completion (Donkor, 2012;Gambin and Hogarth, 2016) The factors identified from literature that contributes to the non-completion of apprentice training programme include age, race, gender, ethnicity, level of education, disability, academic achievement, loss of interest, interpersonal skills, economic background, language (Berik et al, 2011;Fries et al, 2014;Mangan and Trendle, 2008;Mangan and Trendle, 2010;Mangan and Trendle, 2017;Stromback and Mahendran, 2010). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the array of factors that lead to non-completion of apprenticeship among craftspeople.…”
Section: Factors Responsible For Non-completion Of the Apprenticeship Training Programmementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Given the desire to the increase participation of under-represented groups in the construction sector, there is a need to develop strategies for improving the completion rates of apprenticeship among minorities. (Berik and Bilginsoy, 2000;Berik et al, 2011;Bilginsoy, 2018;Donkor, 2012;Filliettaz, 2010;Fries et al, 2014;Gambin and Hogarth, 2016;Greig, 2019;Snell and Hart, 2008;Stromback and Mahendran, 2010). The outcomes of previous research show that a host of factors affect completion rates of apprenticeship programmes for craftspeople.…”
Section: Factors Responsible For Non-completion Of the Apprenticeship Training Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general picture is that dropout is caused by both external and internal factors, and often interplays between the two. For example, a students’ financial situation is considered an external factor (Fries, Göbel, & Maier, 2014). Meanwhile, internal factors may be divided into three categories: students’ abilities, aptitudes, and level of engagement (Lamote, Speybroeck, Van Den Noortgate, & Van Damme, 2013; Van Bragt, Bakx, Bergen, & Croon, 2011); study conditions and classroom environment (Darkenwald & Gavin, 1987; Fincher, 2010); and teachers’ performance and competences (Lippke, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%