2020
DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2020.1755664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do educators matter? Associations between caregivers’ mentalization and preschoolers’ attachment, social emotional development and theory of mind

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating statistical power was difficult, given the paucity of previous studies on associations between educator mental state language and children's ToM. Mata López et al (2020) reported such associations with β values of −.16 and .47 (controlling for family and educator variables), and Tompkins et al's (2018) meta‐analysis of the association between parents' mental state language and false belief understanding reported an overall effect size of d = 0.22 (controlling for children's age and verbal ability). We, therefore, conducted post hoc power analyses in GPower 3.1.9.4, based on either linear multiple regression (by converting the β values into f 2 values) or one‐sample t ‐tests (for the d value).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Estimating statistical power was difficult, given the paucity of previous studies on associations between educator mental state language and children's ToM. Mata López et al (2020) reported such associations with β values of −.16 and .47 (controlling for family and educator variables), and Tompkins et al's (2018) meta‐analysis of the association between parents' mental state language and false belief understanding reported an overall effect size of d = 0.22 (controlling for children's age and verbal ability). We, therefore, conducted post hoc power analyses in GPower 3.1.9.4, based on either linear multiple regression (by converting the β values into f 2 values) or one‐sample t ‐tests (for the d value).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, dyadic care‐based interactions are more characteristic of children's experience with assistant educators. Mata López et al (2020) proposed that this interactional difference may explain their findings of a significant relation between child ToM and assistant educators', but not lead educators', level of mentalising. The present study did not measure the MSL of assistant educators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Näin lapsi oppii, että vaikka aikuinen ei koe samaa kuin hän, aikuinen voi antaa apua ja ymmärtää. (Fonagy, Bateman & Luyten 2012;Kalland 2011;Mata, Santelices & Vergés 2022. ) Varhaiskasvatuksessa toimivien aikuisten on pyrittävä ymmärtämään lapsen toiminnan taustalla vaikuttavia tekijöitä sekä lapsen omaa kokemusta eri tilanteissa.…”
Section: Mentalisaatio Reflektion Rinnallaunclassified
“…What is agreed upon is that ECEC quality can also have a long-term impact on children’s development and well-being [ 8 , 9 ] and that this quality concerns both structural variables (like the number of peers in the group and the ratio of adults to children) and process variables, which are instead related to the quality of relational exchanges [ 10 ]. Educators offer a more supportive, sensitive quality of caregiving when there are favorable structural variables, such as being able to work in small groups [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]; however, a significant quantity of research suggests that it is not only a high-quality organization that facilitates the development of good relationships, but rather that the quality of the child-educator relationship is itself a key aspect of the quality of the educational service [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. An in-depth analysis of the impact of the relationship with a professional caregiver on infant development is therefore essential, in order to offer all children a solid start in life, through quality care and education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%