Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s

Uchiyama, Naoko

doi:10.1016/j.econ.2019.04.001

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other studies also found that CCT program has been succeeded in reducing poverty levels and inequality (Suryahadi et al, 2018), although the percentage was very small (Bourguignon et al, 2003). According to Uchiyama (2019), CCT assistance can reduce household vulnerability in facing income shocks and it has an even distribution effect on consumption so it can improve household welfare in the long term. Meanwhile, CCT program still has a number of deficiencies, for example, there has been no significant changes in behavior and socio-economic conditions from the beneficiaries (Suradi et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Program Keluarga Harapan: Can It Reduce Poverty and Increase Welfare in Indonesia? Household Level Evidence from Districts/Cities in Indonesia on 2019

Resina¹,

Kamarni²,

Putra³

2023

JSEB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon which is a major challenge in all countries. To reduce poverty and improve welfare, government intervention programs are needed. Conditional cash transfer programs are widely implemented in several countries. In Indonesia, there is Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). This program has many debates as an anti-poverty program. This research looks at the effect of PKH on poverty and welfare in Indonesia. It used the 2019 Susenas raw data and analyzed by SEM-PLS method. The findings showed that PKH had a negative-significant effect on poverty and a positive-significant effect on welfare in Indonesia. In addition, poverty has a negative and significant effect on welfare in Indonesia. The research results are expected to be input for the central and regional governments in making policies for the sustainability of PKH implementation in reducing poverty and increasing welfare.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Program Keluarga Harapan: Can It Reduce Poverty and Increase Welfare in Indonesia? Household Level Evidence from Districts/Cities in Indonesia on 2019

Resina¹,

Kamarni²,

Putra³

2023

JSEB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hope Family Program : Can It Reduce Poverty and Increase Welfare in Indonesia?

Resina,

Kamarni,

Putra

2022

JEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ultimate goal of development in developing countries is to reduce poverty that can be achieved through increasing welfare. Poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon that become a major challenge in all countries. To reduce poverty and increase community welfare, government intervention programs are needed. One of them is through the provision of cash assistance. The Conditional Cash Transfer program has been widely implemented in some countries. In Indonesia, this program is called the Family Hope Program (PKH). This cash transfer program has a lot of debate as an anti-poverty program. This research wants to see the impact of PKH on reducing poverty and increasing welfare in Indonesia. It used raw data from Susenas and analyzed by SEM-PLS method. The results of this research show that PKH has a negative-significant effect on poverty and a positive-significant impact on welfare in Indonesia. In addition, the results of the analysis also show that poverty has a negative-significant influence on people's welfare in Indonesia.

show abstract

“…Las Transferencias Condicionadas de dinero (TCD) son políticas orientadas a reducir el trabajo infantil (Del Carpio, Loayza, y Wadab, 2016), aumentar los niveles de educación y el acceso a la salud (García, Harker, y Cuartas, 2019), reducir la vulnerabilidad de los hogares (Uchiyama, 2019), entre otros. En Ecuador, desde el año 2000 se aplicó el primer programa de transferencia de dinero, cuyo fin era reducir el impacto social de la eliminación del subsidio al gas de uso doméstico.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

“…Araujo, Ferreira, Lanjouw y Özler (2008) muestran que los lugares más pobres son más propensos a recibir el BDH y que la pobreza ha persistido en estos lugares. Sin un adecuado seguimiento y evaluación del programa, es posible que la población beneficiada utilice los recursos para otros fines (Fiszbein y Schady, 2009), mientras que una TCD bien enfocada puede contribuir a reducir la violencia contra las mujeres, reducir la fertilidad, la desnutrición, y mejorar la estabilidad económica de los hogares vulnerables, así como disminuir el trabajo infantil (Uchiyama, 2019;Kronebusch y Damon, 2019;Olson, Clark, y Reynolds, 2019;Del Carpio, Loayza y Wada, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Efecto del bono de desarrollo humano en el gasto en salud y educación en Ecuador utilizando Propensity Score Matching

Guamán

Lara

Alvarado

et al. 2019

REP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Do conditional cash transfers reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from PROGRESA-Oportunidades in the 2000s

Cited by 8 publications

References 12 publications

Program Keluarga Harapan: Can It Reduce Poverty and Increase Welfare in Indonesia? Household Level Evidence from Districts/Cities in Indonesia on 2019

Program Keluarga Harapan: Can It Reduce Poverty and Increase Welfare in Indonesia? Household Level Evidence from Districts/Cities in Indonesia on 2019

Hope Family Program : Can It Reduce Poverty and Increase Welfare in Indonesia?

Efecto del bono de desarrollo humano en el gasto en salud y educación en Ecuador utilizando Propensity Score Matching

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About