2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do century-specific equations provide better estimates of stature? A test of the 19–20th century boundary for the stature estimation feature in Fordisc 3.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Documented samples such as the Hammann‐Todd Collection and the Terry Collection at the Smithsonian (ie, Albanese, Osley, & Tuck, 2012) may not be considered representative of “modern” populations; however, these collections may serve in teasing out these variables. The current study attempted to examine how the degree of wear influenced the presence of tori; quantifying the amount of dental wear using standardized dental wear methodologies is necessary for better cross‐study comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Documented samples such as the Hammann‐Todd Collection and the Terry Collection at the Smithsonian (ie, Albanese, Osley, & Tuck, 2012) may not be considered representative of “modern” populations; however, these collections may serve in teasing out these variables. The current study attempted to examine how the degree of wear influenced the presence of tori; quantifying the amount of dental wear using standardized dental wear methodologies is necessary for better cross‐study comparisons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albanese found that using century specific equations in Fordisc did not provide better results (51). However, the test sample used for the basis of these conclusions had birth years ranging from the late 19th to the early 20th century.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination, the Contemporary, Howells, and Forensic Data Bank databases represent a loose temporal sequence with some overlap of specimens deriving from the inclusion of data in the Angel archives. This sequence allows us to evaluate how craniometric allocation for each specimen changes through time, where time represents both emergent processes of contested biohistory and hybridity as well as secular changes of a strictly biological nature (see Albanese, Osley, & Tuck, ; Angel, ; Ousley & Jantz, ; Jantz, ; Jantz & Meadows Jantz, ; Ross, Ubelaker, & Kimmerle, ; Wescott & Jantz, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%