2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11365-010-0168-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do board composition and investor type influence innovativeness in SMEs?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in line with results showing that family firms with less professional management remain disadvantaged when it comes to new product development (Cassia et al, 2012). We also show that nonfamily managed family firms positively disposed toward product innovation question earlier findings of no relationship (De Cleyn & Braet, 2012). Concerning process innovation, we found that professionalized family firms are more effective than family managed family businesses, which is in line with the suggestion that family SMEs are on average more capable than nonfamily SMEs in achieving process innovation (Clausen & Pohjola, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is in line with results showing that family firms with less professional management remain disadvantaged when it comes to new product development (Cassia et al, 2012). We also show that nonfamily managed family firms positively disposed toward product innovation question earlier findings of no relationship (De Cleyn & Braet, 2012). Concerning process innovation, we found that professionalized family firms are more effective than family managed family businesses, which is in line with the suggestion that family SMEs are on average more capable than nonfamily SMEs in achieving process innovation (Clausen & Pohjola, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the literature, investigations on corporate entrepreneurship activities can be found in contexts such as Belgium (De Cleyn & Braet, 2012), the Netherlands (Wakkee, Elfring, & Monaghan, 2010), Switzerland (Tajeddini & Mueller, 2012), Spain (Benavides Espinosa & Mohedano Suanes, 2011), the United States (Eggers, Hansen, & Davis, 2012), and there are also studies for groups of developedeconomy countries (Guerrero & Peña-Legazkue, 2013) as well as international studies (Turró, Urbano, & Peris-Ortiz, 2014). Furthermore, it must be pointed out that among the investigations carried out, very few works are practical or use some specific theoretical framework to analyze corporate entrepreneurship (Urbano, Alvarez, & Turró, 2013).…”
Section: But Despite Advances In Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li, Lam, Qian & Fang, 2006;Shapiro & Tang, 2015a;Song, Wei, et al, 2015b). En relación a la estructura y composición de la junta (presencia de consejeros independientes) como variable de análisis se usó el porcentaje total de consejeros independientes considerando el tamaño total de la junta, con el objetivo de controlar la variable dados los diferentes tamaños de tableros (Cleyn & Braet, 2012); de esta forma, se consideró el número de consejeros independientes sobre el número total de consejeros. Además, es necesario indicar que esta variable ha sido definida de la misma manera en múltiples estudios, entre ellos los de Cleyn & Braet (2012) (2015).…”
Section: Variables Independientes: Dimensiones Gobierno Corporativounclassified
“…En relación a la estructura y composición de la junta (presencia de consejeros independientes) como variable de análisis se usó el porcentaje total de consejeros independientes considerando el tamaño total de la junta, con el objetivo de controlar la variable dados los diferentes tamaños de tableros (Cleyn & Braet, 2012); de esta forma, se consideró el número de consejeros independientes sobre el número total de consejeros. Además, es necesario indicar que esta variable ha sido definida de la misma manera en múltiples estudios, entre ellos los de Cleyn & Braet (2012) (2015). En relación al tamaño del tablero, la misma corresponde a la representación del número total de consejeros que conforman el directorio de la compañía (Cuadrado Ballesteros, García Rubio & Martínez Ferrero, 2014;De Cleyn & Braet, 2012;Franken & Cook, 2013;Honoré et al, 2015;Lin, Li & Bu, 2015;Porter & Kramer, 2006;Shapiro & Tang, 2015a).…”
Section: Variables Independientes: Dimensiones Gobierno Corporativounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation