2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do abiotic factors drive the early growth of juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2000; Phelan et al. 2000; Lanier & Scharf 2007) because difficulties in replicating environmental factors often result in captive fish growth being poorly correlated to fish growth in the wild (Rakocinski et al. 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000; Phelan et al. 2000; Lanier & Scharf 2007) because difficulties in replicating environmental factors often result in captive fish growth being poorly correlated to fish growth in the wild (Rakocinski et al. 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, caging studies are labor intensive and suffer to an unknown degree from artifacts including handling stress, accumulation or exclusion of prey items, and (or) the restriction of natural movement (Able 1999;Meng et al 2000), all of which could confound the response of growth rates to the environmental parameter(s) of interest. Microstructural analysis of hard parts (e.g., otoliths) as a proxy for short-term growth rates may also be useful (see Rakocinski et al 2006), but may also lack the temporal resolution over the time scales of interest in hypoxia studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we previously found that fluctuations in water temperature and salinity correlated with the early growth of juvenile spot (Rakocinski et al, 2006). However considerable variability in inferred growth remained unexplained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Daily proportional growth for every outer increment of each fish was estimated from the increment width relative to the otolith radius (Rakocinski et al, 2000). Consecutive proportional growth values of individual fish were ontogenetically standardized (Rakocinski et al, 2006). For each date over the 38-day study period, mean and standard deviation (S.D.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%