2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2007.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent growth and diet patterns in juvenile spot (Leiostomus xanthurus Lacepéde) reflect effects of hydrology on access to shoreline habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using otoliths, they also showed that free-living S. ocellatus collected from salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated bottoms had similar growth rates, which they attributed to movement among habitats. Another study by Zapfe and Rakocinski (2008) compared growth of young L. xanthurus (20-60 mm SL) during marsh access and marsh restriction in coastal Mississippi. In contrast to this study, they found growth of L. xanthurus decreased with access to emergent shoreline vegetation (ESV) and increased with less access to ESV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using otoliths, they also showed that free-living S. ocellatus collected from salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated bottoms had similar growth rates, which they attributed to movement among habitats. Another study by Zapfe and Rakocinski (2008) compared growth of young L. xanthurus (20-60 mm SL) during marsh access and marsh restriction in coastal Mississippi. In contrast to this study, they found growth of L. xanthurus decreased with access to emergent shoreline vegetation (ESV) and increased with less access to ESV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…xanthurus feed mostly on polychaetes by sifting through the bottom sediment (Zapfe and Rakocinski 2008), whereas kingfish collected from the marsh edge fed preferentially on mysids (Anderson 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators of growth and condition provide integrative measures of the effects of both biotic and abiotic environmental influences on fish (Searcy et al 2007, Zapfe & Rakocinski 2008. As such, these indicators have been used to compare habitat quality (Amara et al 2007, Haas et al 2009, Vasconcelos et al 2009), examine fish response to pollution (Amara et al 2007) and climatic variability (Teal et al 2008), inform management of fisheries stocks or endangered species (Lorenzen & Enberg 2002), compare nursery grounds (Gilliers et al 2004, Vasconcelos et al 2009), and assess restored habitats (La Peyre et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%