2000
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Vaccines: Immunology, Application, and Optimization

Abstract: The development and widespread use of vaccines against infectious agents have been a great triumph of medical science. One reason for the success of currently available vaccines is that they are capable of inducing long-lived antibody responses, which are the principal agents of immune protection against most viruses and bacteria. Despite these successes, vaccination against intracellular organisms that require cell-mediated immunity, such as the agents of tuberculosis, malaria, leishmaniasis, and human immuno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

10
805
0
22

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,091 publications
(841 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
10
805
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA vaccination has recently been tested for many pathogens. Thus far, it has exhibited some promising results (12). It has been known that antigen-specific immune responses can be elicited by the intramuscular inoculation of a plasmid containing foreign DNA expressed (13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA vaccination has recently been tested for many pathogens. Thus far, it has exhibited some promising results (12). It has been known that antigen-specific immune responses can be elicited by the intramuscular inoculation of a plasmid containing foreign DNA expressed (13,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence from different animal models that in vivo transfection of dendritic cells (DC) plays a crucial role in inducing immunity after injection of plasmid DNA (pDNA) coding for tumor antigens. [1][2][3] DNA vaccines combine the most desirable attributes under the aspect of clinical application against cancer: they (1) code for multiple major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-and class IIrestricted epitopes, which may be presented to both CD4 þ and CD8 þ T cells, (2) lead to a preferential MHC class-I expression of the antigen, (3) contain CpGrich sequences that are strongly immunogenic, (4) can be produced as a 'general' vaccine being applicable to any individual and (5) are not afflicted with safety concerns like viral vectors. [1][2][3] Despite induction of both cellular and humoral immune responses by DNA vaccines, application against cancer has been hampered in many cases by the failure of the vaccine to induce tumor rejection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] DNA vaccines combine the most desirable attributes under the aspect of clinical application against cancer: they (1) code for multiple major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-and class IIrestricted epitopes, which may be presented to both CD4 þ and CD8 þ T cells, (2) lead to a preferential MHC class-I expression of the antigen, (3) contain CpGrich sequences that are strongly immunogenic, (4) can be produced as a 'general' vaccine being applicable to any individual and (5) are not afflicted with safety concerns like viral vectors. [1][2][3] Despite induction of both cellular and humoral immune responses by DNA vaccines, application against cancer has been hampered in many cases by the failure of the vaccine to induce tumor rejection. Therefore, in the past there have been several efforts to augment immunogenicity of DNA vaccines, most of them aiming at one of the following strategies: (1) coexpression of immunomodulatory molecules such as cytokines, co-stimulatory molecules or chemokines, 4 (2) enhancing DC-directed antigen uptake and (3) amplification of DC recruitment at the site of antigen expression, that is, by administration of Flt-3L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process results in efficient T-cell priming within secondary lymphatic tissues. [4][5][6][7] Although DNA vaccines have been very successful in inducing antigen-specific immune responses in mice, [8][9][10] immunogenicity in humans and large animals has so far been largely disappointing. 3,9,11 The reasons are diverse, but are mostly related to topics such as dosing, application route, tissue distribution and differences in toll-like receptor (TLR) expression patterns between mice and humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%