1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60367-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Vaccines: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RNA selfamplifying property is of considerable interest with respect to vaccine biosafety: the vector replicates at the RNA level and not at the DNA level, so the rate of foreign DNA present in vivo and possessing 'genome integration potential' is controlled and does not increase following vaccination (contrary to some attenuated or recombinant vaccines). Furthermore, when a suicidal DNA vaccine is transfected into cells, it leads eventually to apoptosis of the transfected cells (Kohno et al, 1998;Leitner et al, 2000), which is particularly important in alleviating the concerns of potential integration and cell transformation generated by the use of conventional DNA vaccines (Gurunathan et al, 2000;Lewis & Babiuk, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RNA selfamplifying property is of considerable interest with respect to vaccine biosafety: the vector replicates at the RNA level and not at the DNA level, so the rate of foreign DNA present in vivo and possessing 'genome integration potential' is controlled and does not increase following vaccination (contrary to some attenuated or recombinant vaccines). Furthermore, when a suicidal DNA vaccine is transfected into cells, it leads eventually to apoptosis of the transfected cells (Kohno et al, 1998;Leitner et al, 2000), which is particularly important in alleviating the concerns of potential integration and cell transformation generated by the use of conventional DNA vaccines (Gurunathan et al, 2000;Lewis & Babiuk, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RNA selfamplifying property is of considerable interest with respect to vaccine biosafety: the vector replicates at the RNA level and not at the DNA level, so the rate of foreign DNA present in vivo and possessing 'genome integration potential' is controlled and does not increase following vaccination (contrary to some attenuated or recombinant vaccines). Furthermore, when a suicidal DNA vaccine is transfected into cells, it leads eventually to apoptosis of the transfected cells (Kohno et al, 1998;Leitner et al, 2000), which is particularly important in alleviating the concerns of potential integration and cell transformation generated by the use of conventional DNA vaccines (Gurunathan et al, 2000;Lewis & Babiuk, 1999).Several groups have demonstrated the ability of suicidal DNA vaccines to induce high-level humoral and cellmediated immunity against a variety of antigens, with immunized animals developing more prominent immune responses than those receiving a conventional DNA vaccine encoding the same antigen (Berglund et al, 1998;Deshpande et al, 2002;Hariharan et al, 1998;Kirman et al, 2003;Leitner et al, 2000). In addition, it has been demonstrated that suicidal DNA vaccines could break immunological tolerance by activating innate antiviral pathways, in contrast to conventional DNA vaccines encoding the same antigen (Leitner et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade a fast development of methodology concerning nucleic acid based immunization has occurred, including experimental vaccine applications in a large number of viral, bacterial and parasitic systems [1,2]. Safety aspects with naked DNA vaccines, mainly concerning possible chromosomal integration and induction of immunological tolerance [2], have incited the development of nonpersistent vectors, such as RNA-based vaccines [3] and suicidal DNA vaccines [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety aspects with naked DNA vaccines, mainly concerning possible chromosomal integration and induction of immunological tolerance [2], have incited the development of nonpersistent vectors, such as RNA-based vaccines [3] and suicidal DNA vaccines [4]. In this context, the SFV replicon has made it possible to construct vectors which may direct the high-level, transient expression of heterologous proteins in vivo [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have demonstrated the feasibility of using a direct injection of plasmid DNA for the induction of protective immunity against various pathogens and the production of specific antibodies [3][4][5] . Recently, phage display technology has been developed and has proven to be a very powerful technique for production of proteins or peptides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%