2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA typing of Diptera collected from human corpses in Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relatively low diversity, especially considering the environmental differences in the sites where the bodies were found, was similarly registered in a recent study conducted on 32 corpses in Portugal, in which only eight species were found colonising human cadavers [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This relatively low diversity, especially considering the environmental differences in the sites where the bodies were found, was similarly registered in a recent study conducted on 32 corpses in Portugal, in which only eight species were found colonising human cadavers [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Post-feeding larvae and second generations collected reveal that these six species are able to breed on corpses in this time of the year, in Portugal. Th e presence of the same species was recently reported from larvae collected in human corpses in the north of Portugal (Cainé et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…This has led to some curious results in articles dealing with forensic entomology. Some recent studies, like the ones by Archer and Elgar [15], Cainé et al [16] and Charabidze et al [17], indicate only Sarcophagidae or Sarcophaga sp., but no species identifications are made. Others provide identifications that are highly unlikely, like Vanin et al [18] reporting Sarcophaga protuberans bred from a human cadaver (subsequent identification of vouchers revealed these to be Sarcophaga argyrostoma; D. Whitmore, personal communication).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%