2010
DOI: 10.1021/nl101046t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Translocation through Graphene Nanopores

Abstract: We report on DNA translocations through nanopores created in graphene membranes. Devices consist of 1-5 nm thick graphene membranes with electron-beam sculpted nanopores from 5 to 10 nm in diameter. Due to the thin nature of the graphene membranes, we observe larger blocked currents than for traditional solid-state nanopores. However, ionic current noise levels are several orders of magnitude larger than those for silicon nitride nanopores. These fluctuations are reduced with the atomic-layer deposition of 5 n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
900
7
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 863 publications
(941 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
18
900
7
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The more populated component exhibits an average translocation duration of ≈22 ms which corresponds to ≈450 ns per bp. Interestingly the measured dwell time is 1.5 to ≈100 times longer than the reports for 2D (5 [15] -56 ns per bp [2] ), biological (30 ns per bp [29] ), and solid-state (40-300 ns per bp) nanopores. [30] Several observations suggest the presence of a strong interaction between DNA and the walls of the trench, which eventually slows down the translocation of molecules.…”
Section: Bionanotechnologycontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…The more populated component exhibits an average translocation duration of ≈22 ms which corresponds to ≈450 ns per bp. Interestingly the measured dwell time is 1.5 to ≈100 times longer than the reports for 2D (5 [15] -56 ns per bp [2] ), biological (30 ns per bp [29] ), and solid-state (40-300 ns per bp) nanopores. [30] Several observations suggest the presence of a strong interaction between DNA and the walls of the trench, which eventually slows down the translocation of molecules.…”
Section: Bionanotechnologycontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…13 Apart from all these encouraging achievements, it is worth noting that the strong πÀπ interaction between graphene and DNA 14 leads to undesirable adsorption of DNA on graphene, which may hinder the DNA translocation through graphene nanopores. Some groups have exploited surface modification, 15 atomic layer deposition 5 and high pH and ionic strengths 4 to minimize surface interaction. The first two approaches ultimately increase the sensing length to few nanometers which is not desirable for single nucleotide resolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we believe that even smaller and thinner pores can be obtained with CIBS using lower energies and/or different sputter ions. Due to their very small effective thickness (comparable to single and multilayer graphene nanopores [19][20][21] ) and scalable fabrication, CIBS nanopores are ideal candidates for solid-state nanopore DNA sequencing systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%