2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.98.088102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Migration and Separation on Surfaces with a Microscale Dielectrophoretic Trap Array

Abstract: We studied the surface migration of DNA chains driven by a dc electric field across localized dielectrophoretic traps. By adjusting the length scale of the trap array, separation of a selected band of DNA was accomplished with a scaling exponent between mobility and number of base pairs similar to that obtained in capillary electrophoresis. We then provided a model, which predicts the trapping and extension of DNA chains at a dielectrophoretic trap responsible for the surface mobility and separation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our device, the magnitude of E · ١E reaches as high as 1.4ϫ 10 7 V 2 / cm 3 which is only one order of magnitude smaller than that produced by Petersen et al 52 in their trapping work. But in contrast to our device, the large values of E · ١E that led to trapping were highly localized near the edges of the gold strips and only occurred over length scales of about 100 nm, comparable to the persistence length of DNA.…”
Section: Possible Reasons For the Observed Differencesmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our device, the magnitude of E · ١E reaches as high as 1.4ϫ 10 7 V 2 / cm 3 which is only one order of magnitude smaller than that produced by Petersen et al 52 in their trapping work. But in contrast to our device, the large values of E · ١E that led to trapping were highly localized near the edges of the gold strips and only occurred over length scales of about 100 nm, comparable to the persistence length of DNA.…”
Section: Possible Reasons For the Observed Differencesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In our geometry, the strong fields and gradients exist over the entire length of the contraction which is ᐉ c =80 m, which is much larger than the radius of gyration of T4-DNA and comparable to its contour length. So T4-DNA molecules in our device could polarize over their entire dimension which could possibly lead to even stronger nonlinear electrokinetic effects than seen by Petersen et al 52 In addition, the fact that DNA molecules are stretched in the contraction could render them more polarizable than when they are in their coiled state, 55 further increasing their sensitivity to nonlinear electrokinetic effects.…”
Section: Possible Reasons For the Observed Differencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…46 Moreover, electric field gradient at the expansion and contraction of the proposed devices might induce dielectrophoresis effect that could polarize DNA and result in unpredictable influence to DNA behavior. 43,47 To summarize, in order to have an affordable but useful prediction, we use coarsed-grained models that hopefully preserve the most important physics but only leave away the unimportant ones. From the reasonable agreement between the previous experiments 28,33 and simulations, 26,48 the FEM-BD simulations used here should be capable to catch the behavior of the DNA in microfluidic devices.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%