2019
DOI: 10.18632/aging.102399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation profile is a quantitative measure of biological aging in children

Abstract: DNA methylation changes within the genome can be used to predict human age. However, the existing biological age prediction models based on DNA methylation are predominantly adult-oriented. We established a methylation-based age prediction model for children (9-212 months old) using data from 716 blood samples in 11 DNA methylation datasets. Our elastic net model includes 111 CpG sites, mostly in genes associated with development and aging. The model performed well and exhibited high precision, yielding a 98% … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA methylation gestational age was estimated from cord blood DNA methylation data, using Bohlin’s epigenetic clock [ 13 ]. This clock estimates gestational age based on DNA methylation levels of 96 CpGs from HumanMethylation450 BeadChip selected trough Lasso-regression [ 21 ]. At birth, children had older clinically determined gestational age (median 40.2 weeks (95% range 37.0, 42.4)) than DNA methylation gestational age (median 39.4 weeks (95% range 37.2, 40.8)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA methylation gestational age was estimated from cord blood DNA methylation data, using Bohlin’s epigenetic clock [ 13 ]. This clock estimates gestational age based on DNA methylation levels of 96 CpGs from HumanMethylation450 BeadChip selected trough Lasso-regression [ 21 ]. At birth, children had older clinically determined gestational age (median 40.2 weeks (95% range 37.0, 42.4)) than DNA methylation gestational age (median 39.4 weeks (95% range 37.2, 40.8)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to adults, there is no clear pattern in the directionality of associations of beneficial or detrimental prenatal exposures and gestational age acceleration [ 19 ]. For child ages, two clocks have been developed [ 20 , 21 ]. However, in blood DNA methylation samples, these clocks were outperformed by the ‘skin and blood clock,’ which is developed among participants with a broad age range [ 15 , 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, many other DNA methylation clocks have been developed for different purposes and tissue targets. 3,4,618 Since their inception, epigenetic clocks have been used to analyze DNA methylation profiles of diverse human cohorts, uncovering previously unknown associations between accelerated ageing and a great number of health-related features. 19,20 These associations indicate that epigenetic clocks do not just track chronological age, but also biological features that are relevant to the ageing process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several DNAm clocks were developed specifically from blood or buccal epithelial cells of children and adolescents. 45,46 These clocks performed well and exhibited a high level of precision for prediction of chronological age. Several epigenetic clocks containing fewer CpGs have also been shown to exhibit a high degree of accuracy.…”
Section: Dna Methylation Clocks In Animals and Humansmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This DNAm clock is commonly referred to as “Hannum’s clock”. 3 Since this DNAm clock was based primarily on adult blood samples, Hannum’s clock is thought to be less accurate for children 4446 and non-blood tissue, 3 when compared to DNAm clocks optimized for those purposes. Several DNAm clocks were developed specifically from blood or buccal epithelial cells of children and adolescents.…”
Section: Dna Methylation Clocks In Animals and Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%