1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0953756297003596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA markers identify variation in Australian populations of Uncinula necator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two genetic groups also have been observed in Australia but without reference to flag shoots (Evans et al, 1997;Stummer et al, 2000). These groups were shown to correspond to those identified in Europe (De´lye et al, 1999;Stummer et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two genetic groups also have been observed in Australia but without reference to flag shoots (Evans et al, 1997;Stummer et al, 2000). These groups were shown to correspond to those identified in Europe (De´lye et al, 1999;Stummer et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Genetically distinct but morphologically similar groups have been identified in populations of E. necator Evans et al, 1997;De´lye and Corio-Costet, 1998;Stummer et al, 2000;Miazzi et al, 2003). De´lye et al (1997) distinguished a group of isolates in Europe corresponding to flag shoots, and another group comprising foliar isolates collected later in the growing season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Uncinula necator), provides a good model system for investigating the effects of the genetic structures of plant pathogens on plant disease epidemics. E. necator populations are structured into two genetically differentiated groups (A and B) that have been identified previously in a number of grapevine-growing countries, including France (11), Australia (14), Italy (26), and Spain (29). Délye et al (11) suggested that group A isolates survive the winter as a resting mycelium within dormant buds, from which growth is reinitiated after budbreak, leading to the colonization of young flag shoots (30,34); in contrast, group B isolates originate from ascospores released from overwintering cleistothecia (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Uncinula necator), is one example of a plant pathogen showing two genetically differentiated groups of isolates coexisting on the same host, Vitis vinifera (Délye et al 1997;Evans et al 1997;Miazzi et al 2003;Nuñez et al 2006). Several studies have suggested that genetic E. necator groups (A and B) correlated with ecological features of the pathogen; Délye et al (1997) proposed that group A isolates over-winter as resting mycelium within dormant buds that reinitiate growth after budbreak and colonise young flag-shoots (Pearson and Gärtel 1985), while group B isolates would survive as ascospores released from overwintering cleistothecia (Gadoury and Pearson 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%