1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-6851(96)02755-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA markers define two major phylogenetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

11
394
1
35

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 502 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
394
1
35
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity and specificity of Stat-Pak were high in Central America, Venezuela and Bolivia, considered to be endemic areas with relatively high prevalence of T. cruzi infection. Although a relatively small number of samples has been analyzed, and most parasites isolated previously from human chronic phase infected individuals were T. cruzi II (Luquetti et al, 1986;Souto et al, 1996), the Chagas Stat-Pak gave comparable results in the different geographical regions studied. Serologic methods are widely accepted for the immunodiagnosis of T. cruzi infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sensitivity and specificity of Stat-Pak were high in Central America, Venezuela and Bolivia, considered to be endemic areas with relatively high prevalence of T. cruzi infection. Although a relatively small number of samples has been analyzed, and most parasites isolated previously from human chronic phase infected individuals were T. cruzi II (Luquetti et al, 1986;Souto et al, 1996), the Chagas Stat-Pak gave comparable results in the different geographical regions studied. Serologic methods are widely accepted for the immunodiagnosis of T. cruzi infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…T. cruzi is not a homogeneous population of parasites; but consists of a pool of sub-populations that present a high heterogeneity in biologic parameters and genetic characteristics (Souto et al, 1996;Briones et al, 1999;Machado and Ayala, 2001). Furthermore, in a recent consensus meeting, the T. cruzi species were divided into two major phylogenetic lineages: T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II (Satellite Meeting, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En T. cruzi se han utilizado diferentes marcadores bioquímicos y moleculares para tratar de correlacionar la diversidad genética del parásito con sus características biológicas. El uso del espaciador intergénico de los genes mini-exón genera dos claras divisiones filogenéticas conocidas como T. cruzi I y T. cruzi II (12), las cuales permiten establecer algunas asociaciones importantes entre la taxonomía y la biología del parásito, el desarrollo de la enfermedad y diferentes parámetros epidemiológicos, entre otros (13,14).…”
unclassified
“…This variation has been characterized by the use of isoenzymes (Miles et al 1978, Tibayrenc et al 1986), DNA fingerprinting (Macedo et al 1992), Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Tibayrenc et al 1993, Gomes et al 1998), Simple Sequence Repeat-anchored PCR (SSR-PCR; Oliveira et al 1997, Gomes et al 1998), Low-stringency Single Specific Primer-PCR (LSSP-PCR; Vago et al 1996) and molecular karyotyping (Henriksson et al 1993). Also, single locus analysis of the ribosomal RNA genes (LSU-rDNA) and mini-exon genes (Souto & Zingales 1993, Souto et al 1996 has suggested the split of T. cruzi strains into three major clusters (1, 2 and 1/2) that possibly represent sub-species (Souto et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%