1992
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.967-973.1992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Abstract: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after SmaI restriction of DNA from 239 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates (from 142 patients) produced 26 different fingerprints. The deduced chromosome sizes ranged from 2,200 to 3,100 kb (+100 kb). A total of 81 isolates taken from 65 patients were then typed by PFGE and ribotyping with ClaI, EcoRI, and HindIII. Ribotypes were less discriminating than PFGE. Ribotyping did not discriminate isolates from a given PFGE fingerprint into different subsets. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
113
1
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
7
113
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, we showed, like others [1,4,23], that PFGE is a very effective typing method. However, it is time-consuming and requires specific equipment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In conclusion, we showed, like others [1,4,23], that PFGE is a very effective typing method. However, it is time-consuming and requires specific equipment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…When we considered other markers such as resistance to antimicrobials or biochemical characters, we were able to further discriminate amongst isolates belonging to a clone as defined by MALDI-TOF MS. Thus, combinations of various epidemiological markers further confirm the possibility to access a more acute discrimination amongst bacterial isolates (Pr evost et al 1992;Tenover et al 1997). This work suggests that V. parahaemolyticus isolates can be discriminated without any identification of specific proteins.…”
Section: Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Is a Significant Pathogen In Marine supporting
confidence: 61%
“…As four of the canine isolates were from animals presenting at the same veterinary practice, the possibility of cross-infection was considered ( Table 2). However, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis banding patterns [12] indicated that these isolates were not closely related [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%