1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(95)90086-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage in nurses handling antineoplastic agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous work, incorporation of antineoplastic agents by oncology personnel was detected despite standard safety precautions, such as the use of laminar airflow hoods and personal protective clothing [Pethran et al, 2003]. The importance of taking correct safety measures while occupationally handling antineoplastic drugs on the potential genotoxic risk has been revealed in several studies that analyzed individuals with different degrees of protection: the more protective measures were taken, the less genotoxic damage was observed [Oestreicher et al, 1990;Fuchs et al, 1995;Brumen and Horvat, 1996;Kevekordes et al, 1998]. Thus, our data suggest that safety measures adopted by the oncology nurses analyzed are not enough to prevent health hazards related to antineoplastic drug management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a previous work, incorporation of antineoplastic agents by oncology personnel was detected despite standard safety precautions, such as the use of laminar airflow hoods and personal protective clothing [Pethran et al, 2003]. The importance of taking correct safety measures while occupationally handling antineoplastic drugs on the potential genotoxic risk has been revealed in several studies that analyzed individuals with different degrees of protection: the more protective measures were taken, the less genotoxic damage was observed [Oestreicher et al, 1990;Fuchs et al, 1995;Brumen and Horvat, 1996;Kevekordes et al, 1998]. Thus, our data suggest that safety measures adopted by the oncology nurses analyzed are not enough to prevent health hazards related to antineoplastic drug management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Some papers described the biological effects of antineoplastic drugs in nurses. Detection of chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, or DNA damage in peripheral lymphocytes were observed [33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have evidenced a reduced risk when effective protective measures were adopted 10,11) , so in the last few years the interest of occupational medicine in preventing workers' health risks related to antiblastic drugs exposure has been increasing and worldwide attempts have been made to prevent exposure [20][21][22][23] . In particular, recent attention has also focused on nursing staff handling antiblastic drugs that have to be administered to patients, and many European Directives (and related National Legislative Decrees and Guidelines) have been issued, aiming to protect nursing personnel potentially exposed to high amounts of various antiblastic drugs on a daily basis [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Journal Of Occupational Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of 1970s Falck et al first evidenced the occurrence of primary tumours for nurses working without protective measures 8) . Subsequently, the possible long-term risk for personnel handling antineoplastic drugs has been investigated and mutagenic (micronuclei and chromosomic aberrations) [9][10][11] and carcinogenic effects (leukemia and non-Hodgking…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%