2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage and repair in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
127
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
127
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The slides were examined at 200 Â magnification fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) to a COHU 4910 video camera (Cohu Inc., San Diego, CA) equipped with a UV filter block consist an excitation filter (359 nm) and barrier filter (461 nm) and connected to a personal computer-based image analysis system, Lucia-Comet v.4.51 (Laboratory Imaging, Praha, Czech Republic). Fifty images were randomly selected from each sample and the comet tail DNA was measured (Blasiak et al 2004). Endogenous DNA damage measured as the mean comet tail DNA of peripheral blood lymphocytes of two mice groups (5 mice each).…”
Section: Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slides were examined at 200 Â magnification fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) to a COHU 4910 video camera (Cohu Inc., San Diego, CA) equipped with a UV filter block consist an excitation filter (359 nm) and barrier filter (461 nm) and connected to a personal computer-based image analysis system, Lucia-Comet v.4.51 (Laboratory Imaging, Praha, Czech Republic). Fifty images were randomly selected from each sample and the comet tail DNA was measured (Blasiak et al 2004). Endogenous DNA damage measured as the mean comet tail DNA of peripheral blood lymphocytes of two mice groups (5 mice each).…”
Section: Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endogenous DNA damage measured as the mean comet tail DNA of peripheral blood lymphocytes of two mice groups (5 mice each). The number of cells scored for each animal was 100 (Table 1) (Blasiak et al 2004). …”
Section: Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary results show elevated levels of DNA damage in these patients (4.08±3.77) compared to controls (1.1±0.9). The high frequency of MN observed in patients with T2DM may be due to an elevated level of OS that leads to a decrease in glutathione synthesis, because the accumulated products of OS, especially ROS, can cause DNA damage [28].This is consistent with a study done by Martínez-Pérez L. M et al [16]. The levels of buccal MN in diabetic individuals are approximately 2-fold higher than in nondiabetic participants, as revealed by Elisabeth mullner et al [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study conducted in Egyptian population also did not find any correlation between duration of diabetes and DNA damage. The discrepancy between different studies is due to the difference in glycemic control, duration of diabetes, or the type of cells used in the comet assay [44].…”
Section: Association Between Tas Dna Damage and Type 2 Diabetes Melmentioning
confidence: 99%