2014
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.968889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage and oxidative stress induced by CeO2nanoparticles in human dermal fibroblasts: Evidence of a clastogenic effect as a mechanism of genotoxicity

Abstract: The broad range of applications of cerium oxide (CeO2) nanoparticles (nano-CeO2) has attracted industrial interest, resulting in greater exposures to humans and environmental systems in the coming years. Their health effects and potential biological impacts need to be determined for risk assessment. The aims of this study were to gain insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the genotoxic effects of nano-CeO2 in relation with their physicochemical properties. Primary human dermal fibroblasts were expo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bar=35 μm increase in 5-HT greater than that often associated with the stress level in the circulation or in the brain [60][61][62]. Since NP intoxication induces severe oxidative stress alone, it is also quite likely that a combination of SD and NP intoxication exacerbates oxidative stress leading to endothelial cell membrane damage resulting in greater BBB leakage [63][64][65]. However, these NPs alone in normal animals did not induce BBB breakdown, although a slight abnormality in behavioral function was noted [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bar=35 μm increase in 5-HT greater than that often associated with the stress level in the circulation or in the brain [60][61][62]. Since NP intoxication induces severe oxidative stress alone, it is also quite likely that a combination of SD and NP intoxication exacerbates oxidative stress leading to endothelial cell membrane damage resulting in greater BBB leakage [63][64][65]. However, these NPs alone in normal animals did not induce BBB breakdown, although a slight abnormality in behavioral function was noted [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that some nuclear uptake of EGCNPs take place at therapeutic concentrations (less 200 µg mL −1 ) [20]. This nuclear uptake is likely to have been increased at 400 µg mL −1 causing EGCNPs to aggregate inside the nuclei promoting genotoxicity [16]. Even though some nanoparticles have poor permeability into the nuclei, their entry is inevitable during mitosis where the nuclear membrane is broken as the cells prepare for division [46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many of the toxicological studies are performed on nanoceria with unknown or poor colloidal stability, a common problem for nanoceria, which gives rise to conflicting toxicological profiles. Although nanoceria are known for their powerful antioxidant properties, some studies have reported their ability to cause oxidative stress [13,15,16]. Ocular exposure is of particular interest due to the ease for sustained environmental exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that oral administration of high dose (1000 mg/kg bw) of CeO 2 NPs induces significant DNA damage in peripheral blood leukocytes and liver cells, micronucleus formation in bone marrow and blood cells, and total cytogenetic changes in bone marrow [58]. Moreover, it has been shown that CeO 2 NPs induce oxidative stress and genotoxicity in human skin melanoma cells and human dermal fibroblasts [59, 60]. A more recent study has shown that low and more relevant concentration of CeO 2 NPs (0.01 mg/L) adversely affected in vitro fertilization in mice and caused DNA damage in mouse spermatozoa and oocytes [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%