2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-007-0478-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage and cellular death in oral mucosa cells of children who have undergone panoramic dental radiography

Abstract: Taken together, these results indicate that panoramic dental radiography might not induce chromosomal damage, but may be cytotoxic. Overall, the results reinforce the importance of evaluating the health side effects of radiography and contribute to the micronucleus database, which will improve our understanding and practice of this methodology in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
42
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite higher radiation doses in our investigation, research with similar methodology with dental radiographs showed similar results compared to our study (ie, no mutagenic characteristic was evidenced by the MN test). 6,11,13,14,[17][18][19][20][21] Differences in radiation dose, frequency of exposition, type of cells evaluated, and site of collected cells may influence the results of the MN test. Some authors investigated patients undergoing radiotherapy five to six times per week over the course of 5-7-weeks 16,29 and others observed the effects of frequent occupational exposition to low doses of X-ray in radiation workers, 2,30 whereas some pointed out the results of only a single dental radiograph exposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, despite higher radiation doses in our investigation, research with similar methodology with dental radiographs showed similar results compared to our study (ie, no mutagenic characteristic was evidenced by the MN test). 6,11,13,14,[17][18][19][20][21] Differences in radiation dose, frequency of exposition, type of cells evaluated, and site of collected cells may influence the results of the MN test. Some authors investigated patients undergoing radiotherapy five to six times per week over the course of 5-7-weeks 16,29 and others observed the effects of frequent occupational exposition to low doses of X-ray in radiation workers, 2,30 whereas some pointed out the results of only a single dental radiograph exposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors investigated patients undergoing radiotherapy five to six times per week over the course of 5-7-weeks 16,29 and others observed the effects of frequent occupational exposition to low doses of X-ray in radiation workers, 2,30 whereas some pointed out the results of only a single dental radiograph exposition. 6,13,[17][18][19][20][21] The literature shows that MN-MNC 31 and cellular death 17 increase with radiation dose. With regard to the different cells employed in the MN assay, radiotherapy is shown to be a potent clastogenic agent in circulating lymphocytes and BEC of head-and-neck cancer patients, 16 but lymphocytes are more sensitive in detecting chromosome aberrations caused by anticancer drugs than are BEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations