2000
DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA as a Possible Target for Antitumor Ruthenium(III) Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruthenium(III) complexes interact with their likely biological targets, i.e. DNA and proteins in particular with transferrin and albumin [14]. Although they show significantly smaller conformational modification of the DNA double helix, they bind tightly to plasma protein with a marked preference for surface imidazole groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruthenium(III) complexes interact with their likely biological targets, i.e. DNA and proteins in particular with transferrin and albumin [14]. Although they show significantly smaller conformational modification of the DNA double helix, they bind tightly to plasma protein with a marked preference for surface imidazole groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1969, the antitumor activity of metallic complexes containing cisplatin was discovered (Katsaros and Anagnostopoulou 2002) [4] enabling the development of new antitumor drugs such as complexes involving organic metals and/or inorganic platinum, ruthenium and rhodium (PAULA et al 2005; Waxman and Anderson 2001) [5] [6]. Gallori and colleagues suggest that compounds containing ruthenium can bind to the DNA molecule, and that this interaction can alter the cell cycle, causing cell death through mechanisms such as apoptosis (Gallori et al 2000) [7]. Evidence also suggests that several ruthenium complexes interact with specific proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport and sequestration of Ru into tumour cells may be mediated via protein transport and receptor mediated uptake (Guo and Sadler, 1999). Due to differing ligand geometry between their complexes, Ru compounds bind to DNA forming predominately inter-strand crosslinks as opposed to the intra-strand crosslinks favoured by cisplatin Gallori et al, 2000). In addition, non-nuclear targets, such as the mitochondrion and the cell surface, have also been implicated in the antineoplastic activity of Ru complexes, particularly in the case of the clinically investigated Ru(III) antimetastatic drug (trans-RuCl 4 (DMSO)Im)(ImH) (NAMI-A) (Bergamo et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%