2016
DOI: 10.20289/zfdergi.392829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diyarbakır ve Mardin İlleri Kabakgil Üretim Alanlarında Görülen Viral Hastalıkların Yaygınlıklarının ve Etmenlerinin Belirlenmesi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in a study which was carried out in different provinces of Turkey by Yılmaz et al (1992) WMV and ZYMV were the most widespread viruses among the tested viruses (ZYMV, WMV, CMV, CABYV and PRSV-W). The similar results were reported by Kızmaz et al (2016). These researchers were conducted a survey in cucurbit fields of Mardin and Diyarbakır provinces and they reported that the incidences of WMV (60.00%), CMV (43.13%), ZYMV (39.38%), PRSV-W (21.25%) and CABYV (16.25%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similarly, in a study which was carried out in different provinces of Turkey by Yılmaz et al (1992) WMV and ZYMV were the most widespread viruses among the tested viruses (ZYMV, WMV, CMV, CABYV and PRSV-W). The similar results were reported by Kızmaz et al (2016). These researchers were conducted a survey in cucurbit fields of Mardin and Diyarbakır provinces and they reported that the incidences of WMV (60.00%), CMV (43.13%), ZYMV (39.38%), PRSV-W (21.25%) and CABYV (16.25%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similarly, in a study which was carried out in different provinces of Turkey by Yılmaz et al (1992), ZYMV and WMV-2 were the most widespread viruses among the tested viruses (ZYMV, WMV-2, CMV, CABYV and PRSV-W). The similar results were reported by Kızmaz et al (2016). These researchers were conducted a survey in cucurbit fields of Mardin and Diyarbakır provinces and they reported that the incidences of WMV-2 (60.00%), CMV (43.13%), ZYMV (39.38%), PRSV-W (21.25%) and CABYV (16.25%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Geographical map showing the distribution of CMV throughout Turkey. İstanbul (Karakurt, 2015); Diyarbakır (Öztürk, 2000;Budak, 2015); Adıyaman (Günay, 2019); Burdur (Çulal Kılıç et al, 2015); Diyarbakır and Mardin (Kızmaz et al, 2016), Tekirdag, Edirne and Kırklareli (Yılmaz, 2014;Köklü and Yılmaz, 2006); Gaziantep (Ozaslan et al, 2006), Şanlıurfa (Ünlü and Güldür, 2004), Yozgat, Nevşehir, Aksaray, Karaman (Yeşil, 2019;Yeşil, 2020;Yeşil, 2018;Yeşil and Ertunç, 2013), Malatya (Örs, 2018), Ankara and Antalya (Dursunoğlu, 2003;Topkaya et al, 2014;Koç and Fidan, 2017); Adana, İçel, İzmir, Manisa, Afyon, Konya, Aydın, Balıkesir, Muğla, Hatay (Yılmaz et al, 1992;Yeşil, 2014;Kaya and Erkan, 2011;Fidan, 1995;Güllü and Çalı, 1994), Sinop (Şevik and Balkaya, 2015), Tokat (Korkmaz et al, 2018), Kahramanmaraş (Buzkan and Yüzer, 2009), Denizli (Özdemir and Erilmez, 2007), Bursa, Bilecik, Çanakkale, Sakarya, Yalova, İstanbul (Uzunoğulları and Gümüş, 2015), Samsun (Sevik, 2017) Like CMV, WMV is one of the main viruses of cucurbits. With the addition of Uşak (Dikici, 2019) and Van (Usta et al, 2018) to the map below, it is infectious for economically important cucurbits such as pumpkin, watermelon, melon, squash, cucumber (Keçe, 2012;Altınay, 2017;Sevik and Arli-Sokmen, 2003;Yeşil, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%