2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmed.2020.100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dixon-based thorax synthetic CT generation using Generative Adversarial Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baydoun et al 139 . tried different network configurations (VGG16, 153 VGG19, 153 and ResNet 154 ) as a benchmark with a 2D conditional GAN receiving either two Dixon input (water and fat) or four (water, fat, in‐phase, and opposed‐phase).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baydoun et al 139 . tried different network configurations (VGG16, 153 VGG19, 153 and ResNet 154 ) as a benchmark with a 2D conditional GAN receiving either two Dixon input (water and fat) or four (water, fat, in‐phase, and opposed‐phase).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that DL prediction reduced the RMSE in corrected PET SUV by a factor of 4 for bone lesions and 1.5 for soft tissue lesions. Following this first work, other authors showed the improvement of DL-based AC over the traditional atlasbased MRAC proposed by the vendors 70,139,140,141,142,143,144 , also comparing several network configurations145,146 . Torrado et al142 pre-trained their U-net on 19 healthy brains acquired with T 1 GRE MRI and, subsequently, they trained the network using Dixon images of colorectal and prostate cancer patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the first case, most methods have been tested with paired data in H&N (9 papers) and the pelvic region (4 papers) except Baydoun et al 131 64,131,132,133,134,135,136 , also comparing several network configurations 137,138 .…”
Section: Iiic Pet Attenuation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it requires more input data to improve output. Baydoun et al 131 tried different network configurations (VGG16 145 , VGG19 145 , and ResNet 146 ) as a benchmark with a 2D conditional GAN receiving either two Dixon input (water and fat) or four (water, fat, in-phase and opposed-phase). The GAN always performed better than VGG19 and ResNet, with more accurate results obtained with four inputs.…”
Section: Iiic Pet Attenuation Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual choice of conventional T1-, T2-, or Dixon-derived sequences as input for sCT generation algorithms derives essentially from two factors: 1) data availability, as conventional T1 and T2 sequences are the most widely used in clinical radiology [ 22 ], and Dixon sequences are used in the currently available PET/MR systems for attenuation correction [ 24 ]. 2) Dixon sequences allow the use of up to 4 channels as input, which empowers the features extraction capacity of the sCT generation methods and potentially improves the overall accuracy [ 25 ]. However, conventional T1 and T2 sequences usually require longer acquisition time than CT, which is a source of discomfort to the patient and leads to geometric distortions in MR images [ 5 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%