2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.02734
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning-based synthetic-CT generation in radiotherapy and PET: a review

Maria Francesca Spadea,
Matteo Maspero,
Paolo Zaffino
et al.

Abstract: Recently, deep learning (DL)-based methods for the generation of synthetic Computed Tomography (sCT) have received significant research attention as an alternative to classical ones. We present here a systematic review of these methods by grouping them into three categories, according to their clinical applications: I) to replace CT in magnetic resonance (MR)-based treatment planning, II) facilitate Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-based image guided adaptive radiotherapy, and III) derive attenuation maps … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(231 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table III shows near minimum, near maximum, and average dose difference from CT based plan received by the planning target volume (PTV). The difference in average dose to the PTV relative to the prescribed dose was found to be 0.166 ± 0.18% which lies within a clinically acceptable range of dose difference of < 0.5% and comparable with multiple studies in literature [11], [12], [34], [35] IV. DISCUSSION…”
Section: F Dosimetric Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table III shows near minimum, near maximum, and average dose difference from CT based plan received by the planning target volume (PTV). The difference in average dose to the PTV relative to the prescribed dose was found to be 0.166 ± 0.18% which lies within a clinically acceptable range of dose difference of < 0.5% and comparable with multiple studies in literature [11], [12], [34], [35] IV. DISCUSSION…”
Section: F Dosimetric Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This can be attributed to the bone classification task which accurately differentiates air regions from bone as both appear dark in the input MR image. The accuracy of prediction by our proposed method is on par with or better than other U-Net and GAN methods compared in [11], [12], [15], [16], [33].…”
Section: E Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although experimental results indicate the superior performance of HRU-Net approach, the promising results obtained by deep learning techniques have shown comparable performance of atlas-based techniques with relatively small dosimetric errors in the field of CT synthesis from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, the deep learning-based methods show drift robustness to the outliers and high vulnerability (Arabi et al 2018, Lei et al 2019. The CNN model, however, is a more desirable alternative for clinical usage considering the computation time, as the synthetic CT generation process takes less than 1 min compared to atlas-based methods that take up to 2 h (Sjölund et al 2015, Spadea et al 2021. Moreover, in our experiment, MLACF took approximately 26 h for reconstruction of one brain model, whereas HRU-Net took less than 1 min Since there are not sufficient 3D models to generate a 3D dataset, all the data we used is 2D slices, which is one of the limitations of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing approaches to this task have been summarized as belonging to three general classes: atlas-based, voxel-based, and learning-based methods (Edmund andNyholm 2017, Johnstone et al 2018). Recent investigations have focused primarily on approaches belonging to the last category, namely deep learning (DL)-based approaches in which convolutional neural networks are used to approximate a mapping between MRI and CT images (Spadea et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%