Divided Landscapes, Fragmented Identities: East Bengal Refugees and Their Rehabilitation in India, 1947–79

Abstract

The partition of the Indian subcontinent in 1947 was followed by the forced uprooting of an estimated 18 million people. This paper focuses on the predicament of the minority communities in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) who were uprooted and forced to seek shelter in the Indian province of West Bengal. It considers the responses of Indian federal and provincial governments to the challenge of refugee rehabilitation. A study is made of the Dandakaranya scheme which was undertaken after 1958 to resettle the refugees by colonising forest land: the project was sited in a peninsular region marked by plateaus and hill ranges which the refugees, originally from the riverine and deltaic landscape of Bengal, found hard to accept. Despite substantial official rehabilitation efforts, the refugees demanded to be resettled back in their "natural habitat" of Indian Bengal. However, this was resisted by the state. Notwithstanding this opposition, a large number of East Bengal refugees moved back into regions which formed a part of erstwhile undivided Bengal where, without any government aid and planning, they colonised lands and created their own habitats. Many preferred to become squatters in the slums that sprawled in and around Calcutta. The complex interplay of identity and landscape, of dependence and self-help, that informed the choices which the refugees made in rebuilding their lives is analysed in the paper.Punjab and Bengal, the provinces that were divided, experienced the disruptions of partition most acutely. The bulk of the killings took place in Punjab where, on both sides of the newly-created borders, the minority communities were almost

Justice at Sea: Fishers’ politics and marine conservation in coastal Odisha, India

“…12 The state of Odisha received a steady stream of Bengali refugees from former East Pakistan in the 1960s, as well as subsequent decades even after the formation of Bangladesh. Interviews in our case villages revealed that several people arrived here from the government refugee camps that had been established in various places, such as the hot and dry parts of central India (Kudaisya 1997). They came here because they were attracted by the familiar coastal habitat to which they were accustomed back in Bangladesh.…”

Of boundaries and border crossings

“…Anticolonial nationalism and the subsequent 'partition' of this territory in 1947 into separate homelands for Muslims and Hindus led to the division of multireligious provinces like Punjab, Assam and Bengal, between India, East and West Pakistan (Kiernan 1995). The largest bilateral flow of refugees in South Asia, and perhaps the largest international flow in world history (Weiner 1993), also accompanied the redrawing of national boundaries• This massive population exchange was also marked by widespread pogroms, especially in the Punjab, where armed violence erupted between Sikhs/Hindus and Muslims (Aiyer 1995;Kudaisya 1996;Low 1995;Talbot 1995). Unprecedented in scale and intensity, the communal riots made the movement of refugees across borders perilous and traumatic.…”

Ghati‐Bangalon themaidan: Subregionalism, club rivalry and fan culture in Indian football

“…No efforts were made to create employment opportunities to enable them to eke out a living. [48] It was under the stress of such plight in everyday life that the Hindu refugees discovered East Bengal Club, which was waging their battle on the sportsfield and surprisingly enough, winning! 'For these ravaged and embittered masses', remarks Nandy, 'the one source of hope, pride and victory lay in the triumphs of the Club named after their abandoned homeland'.…”