1971
DOI: 10.1086/282742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity Relations of Upland Forests in the Western Great Lakes Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
104
0
4

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
13
104
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Mészáros et al [66] found that diversity is low under the dense canopy of a forest because a few shade-tolerant dominant species exclude most of the other species. According to Auclair & Goff [67], the diversity of mature dry habitats exceeds that of mature mesic habitats. These suggestions are in good agreement with our field experience: soil of shrubforest patches is much deeper than that of the rock swards, resulting in more moisture and greater nutrient supplies (L. Erdős, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mészáros et al [66] found that diversity is low under the dense canopy of a forest because a few shade-tolerant dominant species exclude most of the other species. According to Auclair & Goff [67], the diversity of mature dry habitats exceeds that of mature mesic habitats. These suggestions are in good agreement with our field experience: soil of shrubforest patches is much deeper than that of the rock swards, resulting in more moisture and greater nutrient supplies (L. Erdős, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have reported relatively high richness and diversity of ground vegetation during the initial stages of succession after timber harvesting, followed by a large decline as more shaded conditions develop (Shafi and Yarranton 1973;Bormann and Likens 1979;Hibbs 1983;Schoonmaker and McKee 1988;Burton 1989;Reiners 1992;Crowell and Freedman 1994;Gilliam et al 1995;Qi and Scarratt 1998;Roberts and Methven 1998). It has been suggested that the highest diversity of trees occurs in intermediate regenerative conditions, as this transitional period contains both early-and later-successional species (Loucks 1970;Auclair and Goff 1971;Pickett 1976;Connell 1978). In the understorey, however, competitive exclusion of intolerant species occurs earlier in succession because of the rapid development of a shading overstorey.…”
Section: Species Richness Density and Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It depends on various factors such as climatic conditions, continentality, soil moisture and fertility, topography, and disturbance (Whittaker 1972(Whittaker , 1977Glenn-Lewin 1977;Peet 1978;Peet et al 1983). From the dynamic point of view alpha diversity also depends on the successional status of the community, and it generally increases towards the equilibrium level at the climax stage (Auclair & Goff 1971;Peet et al 1983). In my study (Itow 1985) of mainland communities of East Asian warm-temperate and subtropical climates, the alpha diversity of evergreen broadleaved forests is correlated with climatic favourableness, but that of insular communities is not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%