2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-008-0135-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity of bacterial community in freshwater of Woopo wetland

Abstract: Diversity of bacterial community in water layer of Woopo wetland was investigated. Cultivable bacterial strains were isolated by the standard dilution plating technique and culture-independent 16S rRNA gene clones were obtained directly from DNA extracts of a water sample. Amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) was applied onto both of the isolates and 16S rRNA gene clones. Rarefaction curves, coverage rate and diversity indices of ARDRA patterns were calculated. Representative isolates and clones of all … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proteobacteria were observed to predominate in all the types of water analyzed, as could be expected from other studies on surface and drinking water (Zwart et al ., ; Williams et al ., ; Hoefel et al ., ; Eichler et al ., ; Kormas et al ., ; Kahlisch et al ., ). Other phyla with a lower prevalence in the current study, such as Actinobacteria , Cyanobacteria , Bacteroidetes , Planctomycetes , Aquificae , Acidobacteria , Chloroflexi , Verrucomicrobia , Firmicutes , Chlamydiae and Nitrospirae , have been reported in surface and drinking water (Hoefel et al ., ; Eichler et al ., ; Baik et al ., ; Poitelon et al ., ; Kormas et al ., ; Revetta et al ., ; Kwon et al ., ). Alpha ‐, Beta ‐ and Gammaproteobacteria are among the predominant bacteria in drinking and mineral water (Williams et al ., ; Manuel et al ., ; Falcone‐Dias et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Proteobacteria were observed to predominate in all the types of water analyzed, as could be expected from other studies on surface and drinking water (Zwart et al ., ; Williams et al ., ; Hoefel et al ., ; Eichler et al ., ; Kormas et al ., ; Kahlisch et al ., ). Other phyla with a lower prevalence in the current study, such as Actinobacteria , Cyanobacteria , Bacteroidetes , Planctomycetes , Aquificae , Acidobacteria , Chloroflexi , Verrucomicrobia , Firmicutes , Chlamydiae and Nitrospirae , have been reported in surface and drinking water (Hoefel et al ., ; Eichler et al ., ; Baik et al ., ; Poitelon et al ., ; Kormas et al ., ; Revetta et al ., ; Kwon et al ., ). Alpha ‐, Beta ‐ and Gammaproteobacteria are among the predominant bacteria in drinking and mineral water (Williams et al ., ; Manuel et al ., ; Falcone‐Dias et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The bacterial cultures obtained by successive dilutions of the original population, to near extinction of the ability to grow, are named dilution cultures. These techniques were originally used by environmental microbiologists to explore minority populations (131,132). These scientists were also pioneers in revitalizing techniques, facilitating the mimicking of the natural environment to increase the proportions of cultured bacterial species (129,133).…”
Section: Environmental Microbiology As a Source Of Media For Clinicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have also reported seasonal variation in bacterial and archaeal community compositions and structures in natural and constructed wetlands [27,32]. Verrucomicrobia, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were reported to be the dominant phyla of the planktonic bacterial communities in wetlands [29,[38][39][40][41]. In this study, although their proportions showed seasonal shifts, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were dominant in all samples taken from the LEW.…”
Section: Distinct Seasonal Dynamics Of Planktonic Bacterial and Archamentioning
confidence: 41%