Diversity loss of lichen pine forests in Poland

Stefańska‐Krzaczek, Ewa; Fałtynowicz, Wiesław; Szypuła, Bartłomiej; Kącki, Zygmunt

doi:10.1007/s10342-018-1113-4

Cited by 14 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ground lichens have experienced a major decline in boreal forests during the last 50–100 years (Mäkipää & Heikkinen, 2003; Berg et al, 2008; McMullin et al, 2013; Sandström et al, 2016). A similar trend has also been observed in the temperate forests of Europe (Reinecke et al, 2014; Stefańska‐Krzaczek et al, 2018) and alpine and boreal‐montane areas in Central Europe (Hauck, 2009). Several factors have been suggested to be behind the decline, ranging from local‐level forest management (Johansson, 2008; Kivinen et al, 2010; Nascimbene et al, 2013) to regional level reindeer grazing (Väre et al, 1995; Akujärvi et al, 2014), eutrophication (Reinecke et al, 2014; Stefańska‐Krzaczek et al, 2018) and global climate change (Fraser et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 76%

“…Ground lichens have experienced a major decline in boreal forests during the last 50-100 years (Mäkipää & Heikkinen, 2003;Berg et al, 2008;McMullin et al, 2013;Sandström et al, 2016). A similar trend has also been observed in the temperate forests of Europe (Reinecke et al, 2014;Stefańska-Krzaczek et al, 2018) and alpine and boreal-montane areas in Central Europe (Hauck, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 54%

“…Several factors have been suggested to be behind the decline, ranging from local-level forest management (Johansson, 2008;Kivinen et al, 2010;Nascimbene et al, 2013) to regional level reindeer grazing (Väre et al, 1995;Akujärvi et al, 2014), eutrophication (Reinecke et al, 2014;Stefańska-Krzaczek et al, 2018) and global climate change (Fraser et al, 2014). All these factors, the significance of which depends on the region and the lichen species, indicate direct or indirect impacts of human activities on lichens and lichen-dominated habitats.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Response of ground macrolichens to site factors, co‐existing plants and forestry in boreal forests

Tonteri

Hallikainen

Merilä

et al. 2022

Applied Vegetation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All material supplied via Jukuri is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. Duplication or sale, in electronic or print form, of any part of the repository collections is prohibited. Making electronic or print copies of the material is permitted only for your own personal use or for educational purposes. For other purposes, this article may be used in accordance with the publisher's terms. There may be differences between this version and the publisher's version. You are advised to cite the publisher's version.This is an electronic reprint of the original article. This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 54%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Response of ground macrolichens to site factors, co‐existing plants and forestry in boreal forests

Tonteri

Hallikainen

Merilä

et al. 2022

Applied Vegetation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Największym zagrożeniem dla nich, podobnie jak dla porostów z rodzaju Peltigera, jest niszczenie siedliskbezpośrednie oraz pośrednie -przez eutrofizację gleb, co od dawna obserwuje się na przykładzie borów chrobotkowych (por. Stefańska-Krzaczek, 2011;Stefańska-Krzaczek et al, 2018) Bobiec, 2014Bobiec, -2015Szafer, 1969). Profesor Władysław Szafer już ponad pół wieku temu pisał, że "Opieka społeczna, jeśli jest wykonywana dobrze […] jest lepszym zabezpieczeniem pomnika natury, gatunku rośliny lub zwierzęcia […] aniżeli tylko papierowa ochrona prawna".…”

Section: Wyniki Czyli Dane Do Diagnozyunclassified

Jaka ma być ochrona gatunkowa? Część II. Porosty – studium przypadku

Fałtynowicz¹

2021

Wiad Bot

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Streszczenie Artykuł zawiera diagnozę obecnego stanu ochrony gatunkowej porostów w Polsce. W aktualnym rozporządzeniu znalazło się bardzo dużo błędów i nieścisłości, dlatego wymaga ono zmian. W tekście przedstawiono sugestie zmiany systemu ochrony gatunkowej w kraju i zaproponowano wprowadzenie krótkich list regionalnych, oprócz równie ograniczonej listy krajowej. Zamieszczono także propozycje nowych list gatunków chronionych, dla kraju i dla wybranych województw.

show abstract

“…Protection of extant lichen-rich pine forests and restoration of degraded lichen-poor sand pine forests through litter and topsoil removal. Heinken 1990;Heinken 2008;Fischer et al 2009;Fischer et al 2014;Brackel and Brackel 2016;Stefańska-Krzaczek et al 2018 Beech forests Naturally self-sustaining ecosystems dominated by beech (Fagus sylvatica), but commonly managed as productive high forests.…”

Section: Suitability Assessment Schemementioning

confidence: 99%

Suitability of contract-based nature conservation in privately-owned forests in Germany

Demant¹,

Bergmeier²,

Walentowski³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The successful implementation of contract-based nature conservation in privately-owned forests requires a framework of reasonable operational measures. Our study aimed at developing such a framework by; 1) defining forest conservation objects including structures, processes, and habitat types, 2) assessing their conservation value based on the need for, and worthiness of, protection, 3) reviewing the suitability of contract-based measures for conservation. Overall, we defined 67 conservation objects, with 8 of them used as case studies: deadwood, habitat trees, natural succession after large-scale disturbance, coppice-with-standards, bog and fen woodlands, dry sand pine forests, and beech forests. We considered contract-based conservation suitable if, within the contract period, outcomes of measures resulted in ecological upgrading or avoidance of value loss. We identified contract-based conservation suitable for 42 combinations of objects and measures. Our approach of assessing the potential of contract-based measures for forest conservation is novel with regards to its broad range of objects, defined criteria, and various contract periods. It can help to progress conservation and improve outcomes of measures, especially in privately-owned forests in Germany. Further prerequisites are sufficient financial resources, effective administration, consultancy and the mid- to long-term stability of funding programmes.

show abstract

Diversity loss of lichen pine forests in Poland

Cited by 14 publications

References 59 publications

Response of ground macrolichens to site factors, co‐existing plants and forestry in boreal forests

Response of ground macrolichens to site factors, co‐existing plants and forestry in boreal forests

Jaka ma być ochrona gatunkowa? Część II. Porosty – studium przypadku

Suitability of contract-based nature conservation in privately-owned forests in Germany

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About