Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2020408.2020428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in ranking via resistive graph centers

Abstract: Users can rarely reveal their information need in full detail to a search engine within 1-2 words, so search engines need to "hedge their bets" and present diverse results within the precious 10 response slots. Diversity in ranking is of much recent interest. Most existing solutions estimate the marginal utility of an item given a set of items already in the response, and then use variants of greedy set cover. Others design graphs with the items as nodes and choose diverse items based on visit rates (PageRank)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, we consider a couple of other approaches to diversification, which have been reported in literature, though used in other problem settings. These include variants of GCD [5] and Affinity Propagation [6,7]. M-Div : Uses page rank matrix M as in GCD instead of the C q matrix.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experiments, we consider a couple of other approaches to diversification, which have been reported in literature, though used in other problem settings. These include variants of GCD [5] and Affinity Propagation [6,7]. M-Div : Uses page rank matrix M as in GCD instead of the C q matrix.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prior research has focused on generating diversified result [14,16,3,12,5,17,9,8,10,2,13,11]. Inspired by the work GCD [5] and MMR [4], we develop a new technique for diversity ranking of interpretations based on an interpretation graph. As part of this technique, we propose an algorithm to learn the node and edge weights of the interpretation graph iteratively in a biconvex optimization setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the normalization in DivRank from affinity matrix to transition matrix is the same as PageRank. Another notable diversified graphbased ranking method GCD (Dubey et al, 2011) relies on large amounts of training data to learn edge conductances.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the diverse items are selected based on different criterions, including the information richness [28], a reinforced random walk [15] and an absorbing random walk [30]. Instead of calculating the weight of the edge with some specific function, Dubey et al [8] learned the edge weights from data and then selected the center nodes that maximize the entropy of the conductance between the center nodes and the rest of the graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%