2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity and assembly of active bacteria and their potential function along soil aggregates in a paddy field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplification of the cry 1 gene was observed in all B. thuringiensis spiked water and soil samples with Ct values ranging from 28 to 31. The lower assay efficiency in paddy field soil (89.3%) was observed as compared to the river water (103.6%) which could be due to the presence of PCR inhibitors in soil samples such as humic substances [ 36 , 38 ]. Moreover, no amplification was observed with total DNA isolated from unspiked water and soil which are the primary habitats of many micro and macroorganisms showing the high degree of specificity of developed multiplex assay S664 [ 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplification of the cry 1 gene was observed in all B. thuringiensis spiked water and soil samples with Ct values ranging from 28 to 31. The lower assay efficiency in paddy field soil (89.3%) was observed as compared to the river water (103.6%) which could be due to the presence of PCR inhibitors in soil samples such as humic substances [ 36 , 38 ]. Moreover, no amplification was observed with total DNA isolated from unspiked water and soil which are the primary habitats of many micro and macroorganisms showing the high degree of specificity of developed multiplex assay S664 [ 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In actuality, soil microbes have been clocked with doubling times only as low as 7.2 h in the rhizosphere [33] and 14 to 45 days in bulk soil [34] (depicted in Figure 4 as rate of change per h). This suggests that reactivation of 42% [10] 55% [11] 91% [12] 25% [13] dormant cells largely contributed to the increase in active cells. With the same reasoning of a high rate of increase in active cells, dormant microbes were likely reactivating in the water treatment between 2-12 h (Figure 4).…”
Section: Glucose Amendment Reactivated Dormant Cellsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Early studies enumerating redox-active soil bacterial cells report active fractions of 5-20% or as low as 1% [7,4,8,9]. More recently, however, other methods have found over 40% [10], 50% [11], or 90% [12] active bacteria in soil samples. In a laboratory incubation study, transcriptionally active soil bacterial fraction increased from near zero to 15% after 48 h [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%