Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2017
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2017/258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversifying Personalized Recommendation with User-session Context

Abstract: Recommender systems (RS) have become an integral part of our daily life. However, most current RS often repeatedly recommend items to users with similar profiles. We argue that recommendation should be diversified by leveraging session contexts with personalized user profiles. For this, current session-based RS (SBRS) often assume a rigidly ordered sequence over data which does not fit in many real-world cases. Moreover, personalization is often omitted in current SBRS. Accordingly, a personalized SBRS over re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many existing techniques that investigate the combination of the user's long-term preference and the short-term intent [13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In addition, the user's preference for items constantly evolves over time [28], while these works implicitly assume the user preference to be stationary, which seems to be an unrealistic assumption in many scenarios, particularly in the news or shopping related scenarios [5][6][7]13,29]. Therefore, such methods perform poorly when preferences, in fact, are context-sensitive and transient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are many existing techniques that investigate the combination of the user's long-term preference and the short-term intent [13,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In addition, the user's preference for items constantly evolves over time [28], while these works implicitly assume the user preference to be stationary, which seems to be an unrealistic assumption in many scenarios, particularly in the news or shopping related scenarios [5][6][7]13,29]. Therefore, such methods perform poorly when preferences, in fact, are context-sensitive and transient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, such methods perform poorly when preferences, in fact, are context-sensitive and transient. There are session-based approaches [7,[29][30][31][32] that focus on the interest drifts, to solve the problem of the static user preference and intent, while these methods assume that each item in one session has the same influence, which is usually an invalid assumption, especially when considering a user's interactions with items of diverse characteristics. One of the main attractions of search-engine advertising is that search engines take into account the "current interest" of the user and thereby can deliver the right message, ad, or product just at the right time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed ragamAI framework relies on the influence of two separate models: 1. a deep attention model to capture the importance of sequence of ragams, and 2. an embedding model to capture the importance of hand picked features to train. Unlike other methods, which predict next event or item in a given sequence [6], [9], [17]- [19], the proposed model(s) Figure 1 A. Raaga network Networks or graphs have been considered as a promising framework to study variety of applications like influence modeling [20], community detection [21], and recommender systems [22]. Their organization of nodes and edges help to study the structural organization and positional values of entities (nodes and communities).…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FPMC models the user preference on a list and the preference transitions to recommend next set of items. • SWIWO [17]: Session-based Wide In Wide Out(SWIWO) is a deep learning based recommender model that uses a both user and item based feature set to predict the next item. To adapt to our problem, we eliminate the user feature section and add a softmax layer to predict the score of items for a given sequence.…”
Section: B Baseline Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the real world, some user-item interaction sequences are strictly ordered while others may not be, namely, not all adjacent interactions are sequentially dependent in a sequence [4]. For instance, in a shopping sequence S2 = {milk, butter, flour}, it does not matter whether to buy milk or butter first, but the purchase of both items leads to a higher probability of buying flour next; namely, there is no strict order between milk and butter, but flour sequentially depends on the union of them.…”
Section: Handling User-item Interaction Sequences With a Flexible Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%