2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2011.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverse microbial community from the coalbeds of the Ordos Basin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbial communities recovered from across the Alberta Basin displayed patterns of endemism, wherein different microbial consortia were unique to defined geographical regions that exhibited variation in coal rank and physicochemical condition correlating with depth. This result was consistent with reports from other coalbed ecosystems that also observed significant diversity between microbial communities spanning different coal formations (8,9,11,60,61). Indeed, differences in coal rank are expected to influence CBM production as low-maturity coals (e.g., subbituminous coals) are less recalcitrant and more biodegradable than higher-maturity coals (e.g., volatile bituminous coals) due to changes in carbon and oxygen content (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Microbial communities recovered from across the Alberta Basin displayed patterns of endemism, wherein different microbial consortia were unique to defined geographical regions that exhibited variation in coal rank and physicochemical condition correlating with depth. This result was consistent with reports from other coalbed ecosystems that also observed significant diversity between microbial communities spanning different coal formations (8,9,11,60,61). Indeed, differences in coal rank are expected to influence CBM production as low-maturity coals (e.g., subbituminous coals) are less recalcitrant and more biodegradable than higher-maturity coals (e.g., volatile bituminous coals) due to changes in carbon and oxygen content (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In summary, our results show that mi-crobial community structure displayed patterns of endemism and habitat selection across coalbed formations within the Alberta Basin, consistent with observations for other geographical locations (8,9,11,60,61). While some phylum-level taxonomic patterns were observed, the relative abundance of specific taxonomic groups was localized to discrete wells likely shaped by habitatspecific environmental conditions, such as coal rank and depthdependent physicochemical conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Methanosaeta, Methanosarcina and Methanobacterium have been found to be dominant in other coal associated microbial communities Tang et al, 2012), the dominance of Methanoregula has not yet been reported.…”
Section: Microbial Methanogenesis Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terminal step of coal hydrolysis by microorganisms is methanogenesis, in which the acetate, H2 and CO2, and the methanol or methylamine, are transformed into CH4 by acetoclastic, hydrogenotrophic and methylotrophic methanogens, respectively (Table 2) (Strąpoć et al, 2011). Bacterial species from the genus of Bacteroides, Geobacter, Clostridium, and Spirochaeta, are known geopolymer hydrolysers that have been detected in many biogenic CBM reservoirs worldwide, and are typically found associated with archaea belonging to the hydrogenotrophic methanogenic genera Methanobacterium, Methanocorpusculum and Methanolobus, and acetoclastic genera Methanosaeta and Methanosarcina (Doerfert et al, 2009;Ghosh et al, 2014;Midgley et al, 2010;Singh et al, 2012;Strąpoć et al, 2008;Tang et al, 2012). Despite a significant quantity of research on microbial methanogenesis in coal formation, the microbial community composition and its role in coal biodegradation are still not well understood.…”
Section: Microbial Methanogen Consortiamentioning
confidence: 99%