2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diverse functions of the auditory cortico-collicular pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tinnitus‐related changes in excitatory/inhibitory homeostasis are consistent with previously described tinnitus‐related plastic changes in central auditory neurotransmission (Auerbach et al., 2014; Noreña & Farley, 2013). Layer 5 PNs provide excitatory feedback to the MGB and extra‐lemniscal IC as well as local cortical circuits (Kommajosyula et al., 2021; Lesicko & Geffen, 2022; Williamson & Polley, 2019). Tinnitus‐related increases in layer 5 excitability theoretically could increase neuronal excitation at these target structures, potentially initiating reciprocal extra‐lemniscal feed‐forward excitation to A1 (Blackwell et al., 2020; Stebbings et al., 2014; Syka & Popelář, 1984; Williamson & Polley, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinnitus‐related changes in excitatory/inhibitory homeostasis are consistent with previously described tinnitus‐related plastic changes in central auditory neurotransmission (Auerbach et al., 2014; Noreña & Farley, 2013). Layer 5 PNs provide excitatory feedback to the MGB and extra‐lemniscal IC as well as local cortical circuits (Kommajosyula et al., 2021; Lesicko & Geffen, 2022; Williamson & Polley, 2019). Tinnitus‐related increases in layer 5 excitability theoretically could increase neuronal excitation at these target structures, potentially initiating reciprocal extra‐lemniscal feed‐forward excitation to A1 (Blackwell et al., 2020; Stebbings et al., 2014; Syka & Popelář, 1984; Williamson & Polley, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, this indicates the FFR is not merely a passive representation of the acoustic speech signal but is dynamically shaped by higher-order perceptual processes, and by surrounding stimulus context. Such active modulation of brainstem representations might help simplify speech decisions upon arrival to auditory cortex (Asilador and Llano, 2021; Lesicko and Geffen, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, this indicates the FFR is not merely a passive representation of the acoustic speech signal but is dynamically shaped by higher-order perceptual processes, and by surrounding stimulus context. Such active modulation of brainstem representations might help simplify speech decisions upon arrival to auditory cortex (Asilador and Llano, 2021;Lesicko and Geffen, 2022). Importantly, our speech stimuli were designed with F0s well above cortical phase locking limits as reported in both humans and animal models (Brugge et al, 2009;Gnanateja et al, 2021;Guo et al, 2021;Joris et al, 2004;Wallace et al, 2000).…”
Section: Brainstem Ffrs Carry Category-level Information (Perceptual ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinnitus-related changes in excitatory/inhibitory homeostasis are consistent with previously described tinnitus-related plastic changes in central auditory neurotransmission (Noreña & Farley, 2013; Auerbach et al ., 2014). Layer 5 PNs provide excitatory feedback to the MGB and extra-lemniscal IC as well as local cortical circuits (Williamson & Polley, 2019; Kommajosyula et al ., 2021; Lesicko & Geffen, 2022). Tinnitus-related increases in layer 5 excitability theoretically could increase neuronal excitation at these target structures, potentially initiating reciprocal extra-lemniscal feed-forward excitation to A1 (Syka & Popelář, 1984; Stebbings et al ., 2014; Williamson & Polley, 2019; Blackwell et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%