2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/902438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergent Selection and Then What Not: The Conundrum of Missing Reproductive Isolation in Misty Lake and Stream Stickleback

Abstract: In ecological speciation, reproductive isolation evolves as a consequence of adaptation to different selective environments. A frequent contributor to this process is the evolution of positive assortative mate choice between ecotypes. We tested this expectation for lake and inlet stream threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from the Misty system (Vancouver Island, Canada), which show strong genetically based adaptive divergence and little genetic exchange in nature. This, and work on other sticklebac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(164 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly reduced gene flow related to lakeand stream-specific adaptation has been inferred from genetic data in several instances, including both very young and older population pairs (Berner et al 2009, Lucek et al 2012, Thompson et al 1997, and parapatric ecotypes can be sufficiently strongly isolated to be recovered as reciprocally monophyletic taxa (Deagle et al 2012(Deagle et al , 2013. Early work suggested behavioral reproductive isolation has evolved between these forms in one lake (Reimchen et al 1985), but no behavioral isolation was found despite strongly differentiated phenotypes in the only other case in which this has been directly investigated (Rasanen et al 2012). Whether parapatric lake-stream stickleback ecotype pairs represent cases of speciation in primary contact or secondary contact after repeated colonization from the sea is not always clear (e.g., Deagle et al 2013, Thompson et al 1997.…”
Section: Speciation Associated With Transitions Between Discrete Habimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly reduced gene flow related to lakeand stream-specific adaptation has been inferred from genetic data in several instances, including both very young and older population pairs (Berner et al 2009, Lucek et al 2012, Thompson et al 1997, and parapatric ecotypes can be sufficiently strongly isolated to be recovered as reciprocally monophyletic taxa (Deagle et al 2012(Deagle et al , 2013. Early work suggested behavioral reproductive isolation has evolved between these forms in one lake (Reimchen et al 1985), but no behavioral isolation was found despite strongly differentiated phenotypes in the only other case in which this has been directly investigated (Rasanen et al 2012). Whether parapatric lake-stream stickleback ecotype pairs represent cases of speciation in primary contact or secondary contact after repeated colonization from the sea is not always clear (e.g., Deagle et al 2013, Thompson et al 1997.…”
Section: Speciation Associated With Transitions Between Discrete Habimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lake/stream stickleback Threespine stickleback are a good model for studying progress toward ecological speciation because they show dramatic adaptive divergence between populations in different environments (review: Bell and Foster 1994;Mc-Kinnon and Rundle 2002), but highly variable progress toward ecological speciation Hendry et al 2009). That is, in some population contrasts, reproductive barriers can be very strong, whereas in others, similar barriers can be weak or absent (e.g., Jones et al 2008;Hendry et al 2009;Raeymaekers et al 2010;R€ as€ anen et al 2012). This variation provides excellent opportunities to uncover the factors that promote and constrain progress toward ecological speciation ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, strong genetic incompatibilities are unlikely, given that among ecotype crosses can be successfully conducted and hybrids from these crosses are viable in the laboratory (Lavin and McPhail 1993;Raeymaekers et al 2010;Berner et al 2011). Overall, many of these reproductive barriers appear rather weak in at least some places, and assortative mating has not been found (Raeymaekers et al 2010;R€ as€ anen et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allochrony was generally weak, suggesting little scope for it to resolve the ‘conundrum of reproductive isolation’ (Räsänen et al ., ) in lake–stream stickleback. Indeed, the mean Overlap index for parapatric lake‐stream pairs was 0.82 ± 0.11, meaning that RI due to allochrony would be only 0.18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%