2002
DOI: 10.1002/jae.635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence in alternative Hicksian welfare measures: the case of revealed preference for public amenities

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper investigates the divergence between the two Hicksian welfare measures of non-traded amenity improvement associated with housing. First, the Hicksian surplus measures for amenity changes are analytically developed based on explicit specification of utility structures. A hedonic two-stage approach is then applied to empirically show that, for quantity changes, in contrast to hypothetical markets, divergence in real market is small. The paper also analytically develops expressions for the income… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of noninteracted explanatory variables in the present hedonic regression is smaller compared to what one often finds in other studies, such as in Palmquist (1984), Zabel and Kiel (2000), and Chattopadhyay (2002). However, unlike the cited studies, which cover one or more metropolitan centers, the present study is limited to a number of suburban towns and, as a result, we did not find more factors that could have influenced house prices.…”
contrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of noninteracted explanatory variables in the present hedonic regression is smaller compared to what one often finds in other studies, such as in Palmquist (1984), Zabel and Kiel (2000), and Chattopadhyay (2002). However, unlike the cited studies, which cover one or more metropolitan centers, the present study is limited to a number of suburban towns and, as a result, we did not find more factors that could have influenced house prices.…”
contrasting
confidence: 65%
“… It is common in hedonic literature to explore a number of functional forms for hedonic specifications (Cropper et al, 1988; Chattopadhyay, 2002). We tried the semilog form, but found the double‐log functional form performs better than the semilog form with respect to R 2 and with respect to the number of significant variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the practice seems to have remained that of using implicit marginal prices as direct measures of welfare benefits since they represent the WTP for a marginal change in an attribute (see, for instance, Kim, Phipps, and Anselin 2003). Harrison and Rubinfeld (1978) and Chattopadhyay (2002) use implicit marginal price functions (employed in the second-stage regression of Rosen's (1974) procedure) to obtain estimates of household benefits from nonmarginal improvement in quality attributes in the housing market.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings such as this have led to the development of 'subjective social indicators', which are collected by means of sample surveys, in which individuals are asked about their living conditions as well as how they feel about these conditions (Chattopadhyay, 2002). This type of approach offers a unique opportunity to relate reported objective characteristics with perceptual and affective responses in such areas as health, housing, environment and working conditions on the part of the same individuals (Bastien et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%