2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance estimator based non-singular fast fuzzy terminal sliding mode control of an autonomous underwater vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, the main disadvantage of the aforementioned control schemes is the inherent control input chattering that is energy intensive and may result in high frequency dynamics, which is undesirable for underwater applications. Finally, adaptive neural network [11], [14], learning [15], [16] and fuzzy control [17], [18] schemes that deal with model uncertainties by exploiting the universal approximation capabilities of neural network and fuzzy system structures, but unfortunately, yield inevitably reduced levels of robustness against modeling imperfections [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, the main disadvantage of the aforementioned control schemes is the inherent control input chattering that is energy intensive and may result in high frequency dynamics, which is undesirable for underwater applications. Finally, adaptive neural network [11], [14], learning [15], [16] and fuzzy control [17], [18] schemes that deal with model uncertainties by exploiting the universal approximation capabilities of neural network and fuzzy system structures, but unfortunately, yield inevitably reduced levels of robustness against modeling imperfections [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chattering problem in tracking control is eliminated, and the steady-state error in tracking control is reduced. In literature [38], a nonsingular fast fuzzy terminal sliding mode controller (NFFTSMC) with interference estimator is designed to realize the convergence of finite time error and robust control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al proved that interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers can improve and optimize tracking accuracy and eliminate stickslip [19], and an augmented fuzzy observer was proposed to attenuate the negative impact from the unknown output delays, which likely degrade the performance stability of the control systems [18]. Patre et al adopted a fuzzy logic control (FLC) tool to generate the control signal in order to reduce chattering in control inputs, which commonly occur in conventional terminal sliding mode controller (TSMC), and an estimated uncertainty term to compensate for the unmodeled dynamics, external disturbances, and time-varying parameters [20]. For the photovoltaic (PV) system application, a novel beta-parameter three-input one-output fuzzy-logic-based maximum-power point-tracking (MPPT) algorithm was presented and the advantages of the proposed algorithm are verified [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%