2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2019.2958850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Generation Expansion Planning

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, based on the big-M concept, Equation (19) is substituted by the following equations, i.e. Equations (28) to (33), in order to relax the non-linear terms. In this regard, the following formulations aim to determine the direction of the gas flow in a linearised form and set the value of operational variables based on the determined gas flow direction:…”
Section: Co-operation Of Electrical and Gas Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, based on the big-M concept, Equation (19) is substituted by the following equations, i.e. Equations (28) to (33), in order to relax the non-linear terms. In this regard, the following formulations aim to determine the direction of the gas flow in a linearised form and set the value of operational variables based on the determined gas flow direction:…”
Section: Co-operation Of Electrical and Gas Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different probability distributions, different −1 (1 − ) should be defined. A larger uncertain margin can give a lower violation probability, which indicates that a lower value of −1 (1 − ) is necessary [34]. The exact expressions of the different probability distributions are illustrated in [26].…”
Section: A Tractable Reformulation Of Optimal Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The true OROC and violation probabilities of chance constraints should be evaluated by the coupled datasets { ̅ , Ξ̇}, where ̅ is the training dataset from the independent in-sample data and Ξ̇ is the test dataset from the out-of-sample data. Assuming that the random variable that derives from the forecast errors of the RES power producer follows the Gaussian distribution [34], the problem can be solved by the GCC, whose solutions may be compared with the results of the DRCC-based approach. Therefore, the ambiguous chance constraints with a Gaussian distribution are specially described in Appendix D. Moreover, a certain model (CM) without uncertain variables can be defined.…”
Section: A Out-of-sample Risk Analysis For Drcc-based Crommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the EH constraints, Equations ( 16)-( 17) enforce the balance of electric power and heat power. The constraint (18) restricts the electric power to the bound, while the chance constraint (19) ensures that the EH heat power respects the EH capacity limits, which implies that the overlimit risk should be retained at a certain confidence level. Thus, the chance constraints are controlled by the parameters that are defined as the violation ratio ∈ (0,1), which implies that the risk level of the coupled system is controlled by adjusting .…”
Section: Epsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DRO approach can not quantify the risk level. The distributionally robust chance-constrained (DRCC) introduces the chance constraints into the DRO to hedge against the uncertainty of probability distributions and mitigate the violation risk of overlimit chance constraints, which provides the security risk constraints holding with a specified risk probability level [16]- [19]. But the DRCC approach can not provide the specific risk indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%