2012
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-65382012000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributional patterns of the South American species of Hyalella (Amphipoda: Hyalellidae)

Abstract: Distributional patterns of the South American species of the freshwater amphipod genus Hyalella were analysed using a panbiogeographic approach. Five generalized tracks were found: (1) northern Andes to Lake Titicaca (H.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference may be explained in part by the presence in Patagonia, of Southern South American and Subantarctic species (Pugh et al, 2002;Dos Santos et al, 2008). An important factor here is that Southern Patagonia has a few subtropical species combined with Subantarctic species (Pugh et al, 2002;Dos Santos et al, 2008), whereas Northern Chile exemplifies a different faunal region (Menu-Marque et al, 2000;Morrone, 2006;De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2012). In addition, in Chile, the Andes mountains represent a barrier that limits or prevents species dispersal between the two sides of the mountains and explains the marked differences in species reported from zones including Andean mountains (Morrone, 2006), compared to Southern Patagonia, where the mountains have practically disappeared and where it is possible to find many common species (Menu-Marque et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference may be explained in part by the presence in Patagonia, of Southern South American and Subantarctic species (Pugh et al, 2002;Dos Santos et al, 2008). An important factor here is that Southern Patagonia has a few subtropical species combined with Subantarctic species (Pugh et al, 2002;Dos Santos et al, 2008), whereas Northern Chile exemplifies a different faunal region (Menu-Marque et al, 2000;Morrone, 2006;De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2012). In addition, in Chile, the Andes mountains represent a barrier that limits or prevents species dispersal between the two sides of the mountains and explains the marked differences in species reported from zones including Andean mountains (Morrone, 2006), compared to Southern Patagonia, where the mountains have practically disappeared and where it is possible to find many common species (Menu-Marque et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on inland water crustaceans were obtained from literature records (Araya & Zúñiga, 1985;Bayly, 1992;González, 2003;De los Ríos-Escalante, 2010;De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2012;Jara, in press;Morales & Meruane in press;Rudolph, in press), and these were collated into a presence-absence matrix (Table 1, Fig. 1), with respect to the following six geographical zones: 1) Northern Chile: 18º-27ºS, 2) North-Central Chile: 27º-30ºS, Central Chile: 30º-38ºS, Northern Patagonia: 38º-41ºS; Central Patagonia: 41º-51ºS, and Southern Patagonia: 51º-55ºS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature about macroinvertebrates in this kind of rivers is quite fragmented, and mainly describes the presence of Malacostraca such as amphipods of the genus Hyalella (S.I. Smith), freshwater crabs of the genus Aegla (Leach, 1820), and the southern Chilean river prawn, Samastacus spinifrons (Phillippi, 1882) (De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2012;Jara, 2013;Rudolph, 2013), and Diptera, Trichoptera and Ephemeroptera larval stages (Figueroa, 2000;Figueroa et al, 2003Figueroa et al, , 2007, many of these groups are currently endangered due to human-induced alterations in their habitats and the introduction of alien salmonids species since 1914 (Golusda, 1907(Golusda, , 1927Barros, 1931;Jara et al, 2006;Encina et al, 2017;Vega et al, 2017). The (introduced) salmonids, specifically, constitute non-selective, active predators (Soto et al, 2006(Soto et al, , 2007Fierro et al, 2012Fierro et al, , 2015Fierro et al, , 2016Piedra et al, 2012;Valdovinos et al, 2012;Vargas et al, 2010Vargas et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different situation would occur with another similar widespread species (B. gracilis) which is found in coastal and mountain ephemeral pools, in mountain zones in Patagonia and tropical South America (Menu-Marque et al, 2000). The marked differences between inland water fauna in Patagonia and the north of South America (Menu-Marque et al, 2000;De los Ríos-Escalante et al, 2012) are due the absence of the physical barrier of the Andes mountains preventing species dispersion and the presence of migratory aquatic birds. This would explain the distribution patterns of branchiopods and copepods in the region(De los Ríos & Zúñiga, 2000;Menu-Marque et al, 2000).…”
Section: Biogeographical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%