2019
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2019.2917679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution System Parameter and Topology Estimation Applied to Resolve Low-Voltage Circuits on Three Real Distribution Feeders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various techniques for accurate estimation of distribution line parameters have been reported in the literature. [55][56][57] The error reported is limited to 3% 6%. [55][56][57] Let us assume that there is 10% inaccuracy in estimation/measurement of feeder #2 resistance.…”
Section: Impact Of the Error In The Assessment Of Feeder Resistancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Various techniques for accurate estimation of distribution line parameters have been reported in the literature. [55][56][57] The error reported is limited to 3% 6%. [55][56][57] Let us assume that there is 10% inaccuracy in estimation/measurement of feeder #2 resistance.…”
Section: Impact Of the Error In The Assessment Of Feeder Resistancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Smart meters are being rolling out by power utilities in customer premises in order to capture energy demand and other electrical parameters at regular intervals (e.g., 5 and 15 min intervals). Such data are currently being used by some power utilities to build data-based models to observe feeder voltages and energy consumption in real-time (Lave et al, 2019). These data-driven models, which have already been adopted by the system operator in Australia to dynamically size operating reserves (Fahiman et al, 2019), can, and will, be integrated into DRS and VPP portfolios, with the potential to effectively provide frequency support services to improve system stability.…”
Section: Other Emerging Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with other main networks, the PDN covers a larger area, and its measurement conditions are unsatisfactory. erefore, the parameter identification methods used in the PTN may not be suitable for the PDN. In the field of PDN, with the wide application of supervisory control and data acquisition, power management unit (PMU), and advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), some new approaches focusing on efficiency and error have been developed, such as the full-scale approach [5], PSOSR [6], normalized Lagrange multiplier (NLM) test [7], finite-time algorithm (FTA) [8], residual method, sensitivity analysis method, Lagrange multiplier method [9], and Heffron-Phillips method [10]. With the development of machine learning, some new approaches have been proposed, such as a method that considers distance space [11], particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [12], interior point method [13], ensemble Kalman filtering [14], evolutionary strategies [15], estimation using synchrophasor data [16], PSCAD simulation [17], and deep learning [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%