2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.75.064402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of the magnetization reversal duration in subnanosecond spin-transfer switching

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
47
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1͑e͔͒ 15,16 monotonic increase with increasing pulse amplitude. The stepped increase in P S , predicted by our simulations and previously observed in similar experiments as a function of pulse width ͑ Ͼ 100 ps͒, 17 is due to the underlying free precession orbits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1͑e͔͒ 15,16 monotonic increase with increasing pulse amplitude. The stepped increase in P S , predicted by our simulations and previously observed in similar experiments as a function of pulse width ͑ Ͼ 100 ps͒, 17 is due to the underlying free precession orbits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…In contrast with previous measurements where the spin torque is applied throughout a large fraction of a precession cycle, [14][15][16][17][18] in our experiments the magnetization evolves freely except for short time intervals when it is driven by the spin torque. By using ultrashort spin torque "impulses," we can access a previously unexplored regime in which nanomagnet dynamics is strongly affected by the timing of the spin torque pulses with respect to the underlying free precession orbits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, in addition to the Giant Magneto Resistance (GMR 1,2 ) and Tunneling Magneto Resistance (TMR [3][4][5] ) effects observed in the collinear configuration, the non conservation of spin current gives rise to an influence of electronic transport on the magnetization dynamics which itself can lead to various phenomena such as magnetization reversal [6][7][8][9] or dc driven radio frequency oscillators [10][11][12][13][14] . The potential for applications opened by these effects (magnetic memories, reprogrammable logic, tunable rf sources...) has been recognized very early and lead to an important expansion of the field 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Current induced magnetization dynamic on short time scales in nanopillar has been reported. 6,7 The StonerWohlfarth model is generally not applied on the basis that spin torque is a non-energy-conserving torque. In this Rapid Communication, we show how to include spin-transfer torque into the Stoner-Wohlfarth model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%