GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489)
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2003.1258392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of route requests using dominating-set neighbor elimination in an on-demand routing protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this small CDS is very vulnerable to incorrect neighborhood information since even the broadcast data packet collisions can induce extra error in a node's neighborhood knowledge, which leads to a poor delivery ratio. To improve the delivery ratio, [17] proposes to add extra nodes into the forward node sets to increase the chance of successful transmission of broadcast data packets. On the other hand, using a proactive approach, such as with the algorithm presented in this paper, incorrect neighborhood information oftentimes results in too many backbone nodes rather than not enough.…”
Section: Time-efficient Algorithms [9]-[12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this small CDS is very vulnerable to incorrect neighborhood information since even the broadcast data packet collisions can induce extra error in a node's neighborhood knowledge, which leads to a poor delivery ratio. To improve the delivery ratio, [17] proposes to add extra nodes into the forward node sets to increase the chance of successful transmission of broadcast data packets. On the other hand, using a proactive approach, such as with the algorithm presented in this paper, incorrect neighborhood information oftentimes results in too many backbone nodes rather than not enough.…”
Section: Time-efficient Algorithms [9]-[12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For efficient broadcast algorithms such as [16][17][18], there is no explicit CDS formed, but upon receiving a broadcast packet, every node selects a subset of its 1-hop neighbors to be "multipoint relays" to cover its 2-hop neighborhood. Similarly, 1-hop neighbor list exchange is required.…”
Section: Time-efficient Algorithms [9]-[12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For efficient broadcast algorithms such as [12] [17], there is no explicit CDS formed, but upon receiving a broadcast packet, every node selects a subset of its 1-hop neighbors to be "multipoint relays" to cover its 2-hop neighborhood. Similarly, 1-hop neighbor list exchange is required.…”
Section: Time-efficient Algorithms [4] [5] [6] [8] [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this small CDS is very vulnerable to incorrect neighborhood information since even the broadcast data packet collisions can induce extra error in a node's neighborhood knowledge, which leads to a poor delivery ratio. To improve the delivery ratio, [12] proposes to add extra nodes into the forward node sets to increase the chance of successful transmission of broadcast data packets. On the other hand, using a proactive approach, such as with the algorithm presented in this paper, incorrect neighborhood information oftentimes results in too many backbone nodes rather than not enough.…”
Section: Time-efficient Algorithms [4] [5] [6] [8] [9]mentioning
confidence: 99%